Feed on
Posts
Comments

Editorial Illustrations for Lecture 7

 

Symbolism and The Aquarian Age

 With the intent only to reveal and not conceal, most of the editorial illustrations of lecture seven are separated out and included here.  Some contain little stories of their own. 

 pisces4

Relative to the Age of Aquarius the push comes from the Age of Pisces and the pull comes from Capricorn who  likes to have pull anyway, that’s its basic nature.  

 

  In Greek mythology there was a place called the Garden of the Hesperides.   In the garden there was a tree.  The Hesperides, whose garden it was planted in, were very unique beings.  They were called the Touch Sisters, because all they had to do was touch you and they knew about you.  And if they didn’t touch you they didn’t know you were there at all. 

Garden of the Hesperides by Lord Leighton Frederick

Garden of the Hesperides by Lord Leighton Frederick

“We all beheld the now invisible glories of God even unto the God Head.  But by sin and vanity we all degraded ourselves to darkened ignorance and coarse beings.”  The Apostle Paul  

Five illustrations of Paul indicate differences in subjective perception.  Even the artist, Rembrandt,  gives three different examples of Paul;   Remarkably, Rembrandt did a self portrait, posing as Paul for one representation.

 apostle-paul-rembrandt5 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sw-521

 

 

 apostle_paul-rembrandt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

180px-paulustarsus_lkanrw3

 

 

 

 

A facial composite of the Apostle Paul by experts of the LKA NRW, from historical descriptions.  (In Westphalia, Germany, the equivalent of our FBI)   Facial composites can be produced either by trained artists or by computer selection or both. 

 

 El Greco’s Paul:  el_greco_st_paul2

   With all of these iconographic images are we closer to knowing the real Paul or have they distanced us from knowing him?  Have we the discriminatory powers to filter through the false to find that which is true?   Have we a clearer sight than the artist?  Are we affected by the subjectivity of the artist or is there a little bit of Paul (and the artist) in all of us?

 

 

 

There is a lovely poet by the name of David Whyte who talks about this process inwardly.  He talks about repressed images that get david-whyte_falls6pushed down and down almost like geological strata until they become very potent.  And then they come up as something new.  Manifestations of them become highly creative.  It’s what is happening inside of our selves.  Sometimes they burst out and we cannot control them anymore even if we want to. http://www.davidwhyte.com/home.html

 We take things for granted here, and we are presented with symbols that are incongruous.  gryphani4For example in mythology we have griffons and sphinxes and all kinds of animals that are incongruent.  They don’t fit together right.  And if you’re interpreting your dream and you are trying to get to the most meaningful part of the dream, look at the part that’s the oddest.  You know, all those impossible things happen, so symbols, by being incongruent, can bring us right to the point where we are to direct our consciousness. 

 The most complex of all these symbols are called mandalas.  One of the grandest mandalas of all is the astrological mandala.  microcosm-mandala-13In it all of the constellations are lined up or called the signs, and all of the signs are lined up with all of the houses, and all of the planets are in their signs and houses of rulership, and the aspects are implicit within it.   It is the ideal universe.  Just about everything that is in the external universe is in the symbolic universe of the mandala, which means a lot of good thinking.                 

Aquarian Age Lecture 7

Microcosm Lecture Series Notes

 

Transitioning Into The Aquarian Age

 

Lecture 7 of 25 by [R]

 

Symbolism and The Aquarian Age

 

            The title of our talk tonight is called Symbolism and the Aquarian Age, and for a little while it’s going to sound something like church, talking about things from a Christian perspective.

            In the first chapter of Romans that is attributed to St. Paul, but we don’t know for certain, St. Paul made quite a remarkable statement, saying, “We all beheld the now invisible glories of God even unto the God Head.  But by sin and vanity we all degraded ourselves to darkened ignorance and coarse beings.” 

`           We all beheld the invisible glories of God even unto the God-Head.  Now that’s quite an outstanding statement, but it is a statement that has been corroborated by other seers or mystics, Max Handel included.  This is to say that at one time we all had spiritual vision of a very high order.  Now this seems almost incredible and it seems so obvious that we would do something that would destroy our capacity to see the spiritual worlds.   It says we chose darkness over light.  Now we certainly wouldn’t make that choice with our present consciousness and we certainly wouldn’t make that choice if we knew what came out of it.  So there must have been something subtle in the whole matter.  It’s always more subtle especially when we’re talking about who helped us get into the jam that we are in now.

            According to the ……… the Lucifer Spirits, who at one time were the highest of all the angels, persuaded us to take the creative energy into our own hands, promising us immortality – immortality through procreation.  They offered it to us as an autonomous freedom.  That was the selling point, and they really did fulfill their promises.  They gave us some very good things. First of all when our eyes were opened (which means that we developed perception of this outer material world) the whole without was available to us, which had never before been available to us throughout our entire evolution.  We could see the whole external world and we could experience it directly. 

            Now everything that we were told was true.   It was true in ways that even the Lucifers could not foresee.  Now, a good deal of the fix that we are in at this time is not due to what they told us but to what they didn’t tell us.  When we fell, according to the biblical story of the Fall (there are others and they all pretty much agree with each other), it is what they didn’t tell us and how they told us what they did tell us.  The problem was not that we took the creative energy, which is also the procreative energy that is used physically.  It wasn’t that we took that into our own hands.  It is that we took the creative energy into our own hands at the wrong time.  And we didn’t know how to use it.  We didn’t know why to use it, or when to use it.  So we are told, for example, in the Rosicrucian Cosmo-Conception that we took control of creativity before we knew how to use it in terms of harmony with the rest of the cosmos.  So, what we did was introduce adharmony into the whole creation. 

            This is one of the options available to us.  We are free to go against the whole process if we want to.  Because ………. a stupid thing to do that we can do that.  And part of the reason—certainly  not all of it—was  that we took the full creative …………into our own hands for very selfish sensual reasons,  and this is what St. Paul means when he’s talking about vanity.  So we can see that one of the big problems was ignorance about the matter of time.  Now, in the spiritual worlds anytime you journey inward you learn that time is a very different thing.  Even at that, the understanding of time in the inner way is not really clear and easy.  At the time of what is called “the fall” we did not have much capacity; we do not now have the capacity.  We did not understand logical sequence and we could not make connections about cause and effect or about cause and consequence; of reactions to our deeds. 

            This is   symbolized in the biblical story, saying that we hadn’t long enough eaten from the tree of knowledge of good and evil.  When we did this and we took creative actions that we could not foresee the consequences of, and that we did not know how to deal with, the consequences were that we produced an imbalance.  And that same imbalance is present with us to this day.  Many people know, (not all of us, but the majority) that many people produce more and more problems for themselves than they could possibly redeem within one lifetime.  And as far as the consequence, all of us over many rebirths have what is called in Christianity a burden of sin.  We have a lot of unredeemed or harmful things or selfish things that ……… and we have never been able to liquidate them.  Now the imbalance was something different than that.  It was self-perpetuating and it continued to make things worse.  When we chose to use the creative force to excess, downwardly and outwardly, we directed our attention more into the material worlds and away from the Spirit. 

            The consequence of this imbalance was that we did not have insight working harmoniously with experience.  It is all right to make mistakes, for if we learn from those mistakes and have intuitive insights into what those mistakes mean, we grow.  But when we have become so preoccupied with sensation and material living, we take the experience but we neglect the insight.  And as a consequence we make the same dumb mistakes again and again and again.  I am willing to believe that everyone in the room has had the experience of doing something stupid and doing it again and again and again, because we don’t have the insight to understand that that’s what it is.  We make mistakes and don’t even know that we make the mistakes. Now in the story of “the fall” as it is told in the Bible, we are seeing that in our eating of the tree of good and evil the big sin was disobedience against Jehovah. 

            Now that’s a little bit hard for me to swallow because I am a child of fire, and not a child of water, and I don’t believe obedience is the be all and end all; it’s probably one factor.  When Paul uses the word vanity it helps to understand this.  It intimates that selfishness (which is another name for vanity) and not merely the use of the sexual energy was the problem.   It was that it was used selfishly.  And when it was used selfishly this egoism that resulted from it changed our perception or our, how do say it, our viewpoint of the whole cosmos.  Previous to this when we were inward our consciousness was more universal.  We were part of the general unity of all humanity.  And we were unconscious altruists.  But when we changed perspective from altruism to the individual we changed the entire outlook. 

            Our perspective became subjective and it became a “now it’s me against the world” kind of thing; we lost that universal understanding of things that had previously been ours.  So this produced an inversion; we saw things backwards.  We saw things, not in terms of the purpose for all of humanity, but we saw things from only our own point of view. 

            Since then, over many thousands and thousands of years, the inversion became more complete,  so that now people, in their vanity, think that they are equal to God—and those kinds of inversions.  The Rosicrucian Philosophy, like other modern Western philosophies, claims that the fall of humanity was not a complete disaster and that some very fine things can come out of it, things that were not planned for in our evolution.  They can come out of it if we take advantage of them.   

            When we were cast out of the Garden of Eden that’s another way of saying that we lost our inner vision.  We used to be able to see as the statement of St. Paul says, “…right to the very Godhead.”  We closed that off, and now we see only from our own selfish point of view and we see only outwardly into the material world.  Some philosophers have called that an isolation, or a quarantine, or an exile from Heaven into a world of bare matter.  But in this world we actually do have freedom, a very special freedom.  We didn’t do our creative life experiments—we can live our lives the way we want to live them without being led around willy-nilly by the divine spiritual hierarchies.  You know, there’s nobody that we can see commanding us to do things whether we want to do them or not.  We have that kind of freedom.  We can even sin if we want to sin, and we can work (ad-harmoniously) if we want to and it seems that we are almost prone to it.  It’s almost as if we had developed the habit of not working in harmony.  So we can see that we’re going to learn.  From the knowledge of good and evil we know about cause and consequence, and we know that everything we do is going to have retributive reaction to it, and through that we learn.  We learn the nature of the law from the outside.  We can look at it as objectively as we now look at law in physical law in the sciences.  That’s one of the benefits about all of this.  There are many other benefits to our fall from grace.  This would take a whole series of lectures to talk about them and that’s not our purpose.  We’re only going to look at one of the consequences of the fall into materialism.  And we’re going to look at it as it pertains to the Aquarian Age.  That problem is a problem of illusion and repression.  In this series of talks this is the talk that relates Pisces to Aquarius.  Therefore we are finally done with the first introduction… this whole talk is mostly introductions.  By the end of the night we’ll actually say something.  Let’s start by telling part of a story—a story that is not a Bible story but is parallel to it.  And if we get into the charming world of pagan mythology it gets me out of sounding too much like the preacher, because if I continued I’d be pounding my fist into my hand and we certainly don’t want that.  Yea, one amen and I’m out the door.  I have nothing against that way of approaching spirituality but it’s just not me.  In Greek mythology there was a place called the Garden of the Hesperides.  

            The tree was guarded not only by the Hesperides but there were other guards.  First of all there was the thousand-eyed who kept all the eyes…. one of the eyes was open at least all the time.  And the other guard of the tree was called Leper, a dragon who wrapped himself around the base of the tree and never let anyone approach even though he slept under the tree.  In the tree there were other creatures that slept; most notably there were bears that slept in the tree.  And in this tree there were Aphrodite’s’ apples of the light (life), which were an invaluable prize.  If you ate them you’d have eternal life as long as you were eating the apples of Aphrodite. 

            This is a (seriously) different story from the Adam and Eve story but it is parallel.  Now obviously it is the same story because when we’re in the external world all of our senses used to be called the five senses of touch.  And we’re talking here about an externalization of consciousness and the Hesperidins represent an innocent sense of touch–you know everything in the external world.  The tree was probably the electromagnetic field of the earth, because if you have etheric vision and you’re standing near the North Pole you can see the energy of the whole earth that comes out like a big trunk, an immense trunk, and it spreads out like a tree—as in magnetic fields that you probably studied in your high school and maybe in your junior grade school.

            In one point of view it is the Bhodi tree where Buddha put his statue when he had his enlightenment.  And from another point of view it is probably the world tree that Christ Jesus was crucified on.  The Dragon is the constellation of Draco which used to wind around the North Pole; and the bears that sleep in the tree, if you would look through the light energy of the North Pole you would see the constellations of Versa Major and Versa Minor which are the great and small bears.  The eyes of Argos are the stars themselves which are at the same time the apples of Aphrodite.  The light (life) not only comes from our Sun but from every other star.  It says the stars are pinholes into the spiritual worlds that are worlds of light and of creative love.  

            Richard Wagner in his Ring Cycle had a similar story only they were called the Apples of Freya as they are in Norse mythology.  And he has it happen right in the first …..of the ring Cycle that after the gods have built a new kingdom for Woton he wants to welch on the bet.  And the bet is on the deal. And the deal is that ….   Gee do you know what I just did?  I just used a racial epithet called welching   It’s in the language and it’s so much that you don’t realize it sometimes.  But the deal was that they would get Freya and her Golden Apples for building the new palace for Woton.  He did not want to pay up.  So they said they would settle for the gold of the Neibelungens instead.  And he didn’t want to give up the gold of the Neibelungens either.   So he had to give them Freya because of the contract that he had to give them Freya and when they took her away the Gods were no longer eating the apples of life and they all started to wither away right on the opera stage, and to see a huge big opera star wither away is quite something.  After the light effects, if you’ve ever seen the opera they all turn grey is the way it is.  So you can see that this tree which is a Tree of Life—it’s in Norse mythology, it’s in Greek mythology, and it’s in Hebrew mythology from the Old Testament.

             If we go back to Genesis we see that in the middle of the Garden of Eden was also the tree of life.  So there were two trees or one tree by two different names.  There was the tree of knowledge and there was the tree of life.  And in the same way that the tree of life was guarded by the Hesperides and the dragon and everything else the tree of life in the Garden of Eden was guarded by various spiritual beings who kept us from eating of its fruit.  Because if that were the case we could perpetuate bodies even very imperfect bodies like we have now.  And we would be mortally ill or something like that.        So what we’re talking about here is about how these stories relate to our life in this world, because we don’t have much life in this world.  Our life here is rather dead; this world is moribund compared to the inner spiritual worlds.  Even the Sun, which is the really big apple that is our primary source of light and life, is only available on a part-time basis.  And the light that comes from the Sun has to be translated to us by the plant kingdom.  Or we don’t get the life. 

            The images don’t match perfectly but in this world we’re something like desert plants.  We have brought ourselves to a state of evolution where there is little of the water of life.  And we spend so much time holding onto that little bit that we do have, there is little left for any growth.    It is kind of ironic because we took the power of creation into our own hands so that we would have immortality and immortal life.   And the consequence of it was because of the way we did it we ended up with very little life and too much matter.  Our lives are repressed.  We finally got to one of the words that the talk is about. 

            Our lives are repressed by the weight of materialism.  The spirit is encased in material repression.  And we have made our solitary confinement.  In this world we’ve turned it into something like cruel and inhuman treatment.  The life that we need is more than just sunshine, it is a vital life, so that we can really live.  It’s like a water of life.  We also need feelings—emotions that motivate us—especially the higher kinds of feelings.  So we need the water of feeling.  We also need truth in the form of thoughts because that’s the way we generally apperceive truth.  So we need the water of truth.  So when we’re talking about this water that has been specialized in such a way that we can use it, we’re talking about the apple. 

            And so the apple of apples is of vitality and of emotion and of truth and intuition all at the same time.  They are vehicles or vessels of those things for our development.   They are something like libido.  Therefore, the stories of eating the apple are associated to sexuality and libido which carries emotions and thoughts and everything else that’s part of this being—as is concentrated in spinal fire, which is what we are talking about—our personal private tree of life and our personal private tree of knowledge.  We’re talking about libido.  Now probably the most important vehicle for bringing this life and light and wisdom to us has been symbolism.   And so we finally got the topic of the night: symbolism.        Symbolism is well suited to bringing inner spiritual world of life and light to us.  Myths and stories: our lives.  So they carry life.  We just saw that all of these stories spring to life quite easily.  Symbols have morals built right into them.  All of the stories have them, and they satisfy our psychological needs.  So the symbols are very important in that way.  And they have that special way of conveying the spiritual worlds into this material world in a way that we long for and you know almost any child, in fact any adult who longs for those stories, because there is something of that other world that leads us to where we want to be spiritually, and where we are lost from because of the preoccupation with matter. 

            Symbols are flexible and ambiguous enough so that they have many different sides and interpretations.  And so all of the different nuances in truth into the spiritual worlds can (not all of them, but quite a few of them) be carried through symbols.  Symbols are capable of variation.  They can be molded into a fabric so that you have an entire mythos.  And, they can be adapted to different people at different times.  They point to moral growth and they point to evolutionary objectives, which is why the stories were given to us in the first place—so that we would have the moral guidance and so we could see for ourselves through experience. 

            Myths change and times change.  People change and their myths change with them.  We’re talking about symbols and how flexible they are.  Now there are many different kinds of symbols.  Some things are made into symbols that are not symbols in their basic being.  Trees: we can look at the tree or carve our initials on it, you know, ‘John loves Mary.’  That tree then becomes a symbol of something more than just a tree for what it is in itself.  Even nature forces like fire and water have a symbolic character that goes beyond just their physical nature.  And we can even take some things and we can superimpose symbols upon them whether it is good for them or not.  We do this a lot with our pets.  We say here’s a good doggie, and there isn’t a dog knows whether the hug is good compared to any other, and we project all kinds of things on our dogs and we neurotify them.  Unlike cats they’re not so easily neurotified.  And like most our age ………cat before the dog people………….

            Sometimes symbols are very abstract, very artificial.  We have geometric figures and numbers that stand for relationships that can only be seen with the invisible eye—with the inner eye.  They can’t really be seen physically.  Sometimes we need to be disrupted from our materialistic pragmatism.  We take things for granted here, and we are presented with symbols that are incongruous. gryphani1 For example in mythology we have griffons and sphinxes and all kinds of animals that are incongruent.  They don’t fit together right.  And if you’re interpreting your dream and you are trying to get to the most meaningful part of the dream, look at the part that’s the oddest.  You know, all those impossible things happen, so symbols, by being incongruent, can bring us right to the point where we are to direct our consciousness. 

            Again, sometimes symbolic elements are woven together and we have a whole grand mythical world around us.  We just saw a piece of that grand mythical world when we talked about the garden of the Hesperides.  Then there are also symbols that are compounded to other symbols.  And the most complex of all these symbols are called mandalas.  Mandalas arise in cultures from all over the world.  We are treated in this city; every now and then the Buddhist monks make sand mandalas, which are beautiful.  They’re brilliant in color and they have all of these details to them.  And if you choose to sit next to Ela in this class you get treated to a partial mandala every time there’s a lecture, because she makes drawings in classes according to what’s going through the psyche.  

            The word mandala comes from primitive people.  Primitive people, when they needed to dance without the use of any instruments, would form themselves into a perfect circle and they would dance in that perfect circle round and round until they had worn away all the vegetation, until it was just earth there.  It’s truly interesting because one of the most advanced forms of dance is modern Eurhythmy by Rudolph Steiner’s wife.  All of my friends who have gone through Eurhythmy school find that the first thing that the class does together as a class is find the ability to make a circle.  It’s as if the circle, the symbol of spiritual perfection, is universal in any kind of expression. 

            One of the grandest mandalas of all is the astrological mandala.  In it all of the constellations are lined up or called the signs, and all of the signs are lined up with all of the houses, and all of the planets are in their signs and houses of rulership, and the aspects are implicit within it.   It is the ideal universe.  Just about everything that is in the external universe is in the symbolic universe of the mandala, which means a lot of good thinking.  For example, the battle of the sexes is built right into the mandala.  If you look at the toilet doors in a lot of establishments men have the Mars symbol and Venus is the symbol for the women.  And the martial signs are always opposite the Venusian signs.  So you have this built right into the mandala and you have that kind of sexual differentiation. 

            You have the relationship, for example, of immediate experience in a triangular relationship leading to education.  Education, on the other hand, leads to higher purpose philosophy or the understanding of things.   And from higher purpose you are brought to new fresh experience.  So, all of these things are really built into it.  The ninth House, for example, is the house of theory.  It’s at a 90 degree angle from the 6th House which is the house of practice.  So, theory and practice are in a constant struggle in humanity and this is symbolized right within the astrological mandala. 

            Now in this whole series of talks, that are going to be about 25 talks, we are looking at each of the Signs of the Zodiac relative to Aquarius.    To that we’re trying to look at problems that relate to the Aquarian Age.  We are using the mandala for that purpose.  The second talk, which was the flagship talk, was called The Holy Grail and the Aquarian Age in Heaven and Earth.   We noted that when you go around the astrological mandala there are two directions that you can go.  When you go forward, as the planets seem to go forward, what you’re looking at is a symbolic direction of time in which things go forward.  We can look at Heracles through the forward projection of the Zodiac.            The other way that we can look at them is by when things go backwards like the precession of the equinoxes.  That is what we have been doing.  The ……… is now about here in the constellation of Pisces and it’s working its way toward Aquarius, which is the Aquarian Age.  So we see on the mandala when you look at precession you are looking at consciousness of humanity historically.  (In the background of the cosmos it’s being directed toward Aquarius).  This can be looked at in a number of different levels, but we don’t want to get too far into that because we could go too far a-field and go to pot and the talk would end very quickly.   What we’re doing is looking at the mandala’s a very difficult thing.  It’s difficult enough to look at reality and see how everything is connected to everything else.  It’s difficult to look at the mandala and see how everything is connected together in the mandala and then try to pass from one to the other with intellectual understanding. 

            This is a seemingly difficult thing to do and it’s not something that everyone wants to do.  I don’t think that even in theoretical astrology, looking at it now is for everyone.  Some people are suited for it and some people are not.  When we look at the mandala it is basically a circle which brings us to that perfect circle of very primitive people dancing in a circle.  The one reality of all the mandala’s is unity.   What we live in is a universe.  It’s all one.  It’s all within that one circle—the center is everywhere and the circumference that is nowhere.  There is a maxim that talks about spiritual circumference and unity.  The more that we can look at it in our consciousness the better it is because it removes a lot of superstitions and misunderstandings and it causes us to be open so that we can see how all things relate to other things.  That maxim is “everything is in everything.”  Very simple, everything is in everything. 

            In the same way that the spiritual worlds interpenetrate this gross material world, everything is interpenetrated by the One.  Anything that happens on one plane is within the One.  And so it affects every other plane, because everything is in everything.  That’s another way of looking at the use of the words.  Everything, the All, is in everything.  And so everything is then connected in that way. 

            So if the astrological mandala is to be a symbol or representation of that entire universe, it has to be like that, and even in its most simple astrological makeup it is.  We can’t know something about the Signs without the same kind of knowing something about the Planets.  And we can’t know something about the Planets without knowing something about the Constellations or the Houses, or the Aspects, because everything is tied together.  

            When we sat two weeks ago we talked about the 180-degree relationship, the opposition.  We talked about the fulfillment of altruism through individual love with Leo and a few other things at the same time.  Before that we talked about the 150-degree relationship which is sometimes called the quincunx.  We showed how the esotericism of the Pisces/Virgo Age becomes the exotericism of Aquarius, and how the exotericism with the Piscean Age becomes esotericism in the Age of Aquarius and Leo.  That aspect showed how things pass from “the within” to “the without” and from “the without” back into “the within.”  This is a very abstract kind of thing.  In this talk and in the next talk we’re going to talk about the complement to the 150-degree aspect, which is the 30-degree relationship.  It’s called the semi-sextile   Now, in rosy Rosicrucian Philosophy we talk about the life cycle from rebirth until we are reborn again.  And we know that at the height of that life cycle, when we are most our Self with a capital S when we are divine beings and all of our experience and all of the seeds of all of our vehicles of experience are one and we are one with the universe, we get the big picture.  We see for ourselves the divine plan, the purpose of it all.  And we are filled with inspiration.  When we are filled with inspiration we become divine beings.  And divine beings give. 

            So, we want to give, and because we want to give we come back to rebirth.  That giving-out attracts to us the matter of the various planes until we come back to this world and are born in this physical point.  When we’re inspired to come back, our whole life is set spinning.  And everything spins forward.  As we spin forward we go deeper and deeper into matter.  As long as we’re looking forward in life (light) we become more material.   In fact, as we continue that route in life, we become more stony the older that we become, until we cannot sustain the will to live.  (The creative inspiration that set us going on this whole cycle) and we let go.  And when we let go everything unwinds.  All of the matter is taken back into the spirit.  So what we are talking about here is about the whole life cycle. 

            If we start and we say birth is at the Ascendant, when we get to the cusp of Cancer wherein Cancer rules the womb, and that is when we come to the materialized manifestation of the physical world and we continue forward.  We continue forward until we meet the limit of our capacity to move forward and then we let go.  And then things unwind.  We reflect and we look back and we assimilate.  This is the cycle that we do again and again and again.  This same cycle, if we put the Sun and the Moon on the Ascendant, we can follow

..………… the Lunation cycle that we have every month in the heavens and we can understand the cycle of cycles relative to seeing what happens or what unfolds month by month in our lives.  In this cycle, as it is on the mandala, the Cusps represent significant points.  …………It is the beginning of things.  It is the now.  It is the birth.  When you come to the first Cusp forward, that represents a change of state.    But when it is all at the moment of birth it is all very exciting.  It is all very projective.  You are going forward, and you meet the second house cusp and there is a basic change of state.  And that basic change of state is called consolidation.  Taurus represents ………means making things dense, it means bringing things to a state of  ……………  At the end of the cycle, when we have basically given up everything and we have dissolved everything, there is a change of state at the last cusp.  And that is called collapse.  So the two basic changes of state are consolidation and collapse. 

            And these work very well when you are looking at two planets in the semi-sextile relationship.  This is called first semi-sextile ……..is called a second semi-sextile.  I don’t want to go into that too much because it would take us too far away again.  This rendition of things that we are talking about now is relative to manifestation in form, in matter, in space.  We are looking at time.  We are looking at the other potential.  We are interested in changes of consciousness that happen in history.  And so the Cusps which we are looking backward in the …………..have different meanings.   So that what happens from the past is what pushes us forward.  What happens from the future or that comes to us from the future is what pulls us forward.  In some cases we are forced to make changes from the past.  In some cases we are pulled forward by the possibilities of the future.  So the two ……… when you look at them in terms of the………represent push and pull.   Relative to the Age of Aquarius the push comes from the Age of Pisces and the pull comes from Capricorn.  Capricorn likes to have pull anyway, that’s its basic nature.   In this talk when we finally get to it…….(laughing. …………)  What we finally get to in this talk is we will talk of Pisces.  The next time we meet in two weeks it will be the talk associated with Capricorn.  pisces1

            Pisces rules the feet.  And evolution is another name for growing up.  If we put the two of them together we have a very simple basic understanding of what the push is like.  I grew up in a relatively poor family.  I knew what it was to have tight shoes.  It means that pressure of going forward… the pushing forward was repressed by the shoes that were getting too small.  That power to move forward from the past, that kind of life is the push that we’re talking about when we’re talking about the Age of Pisces relative to the Age of Aquarius.    Pisces rules the shoes.  So the materialism that holds things in so that they do not go, they don’t come to light.  It’s like Pisces also.  In fact, in cosmographical astrology Pisces represents the dense physical plane.  We are in our Twelfth House Pisces imprisonment.  And our consciousness is almost exclusively focused in the material plane.  Because of this preoccupation with matter our [lessons] with the spiritual worlds has been through symbolism.  Symbolism is a stop-gap that means to make up for our tradition of having fallen into matter.  The funny thing is that some people want to be imprisoned.  We refer to them as lifers.  And they content themselves with what they can see through the chinks in the wall or what they can see on the television screen.  Materialistically (or materialist analytical psychologists) we do not believe we can have waking consciousness in the spiritual worlds.  They call the spiritual worlds the unconscious.  And so they are like the prisoners who are content with being in prison.  To them symbolism is the ideal vehicle to reach the unconscious.  It is sort of like the television screen that says what is going on in the outer world.  For such a psychologist, symbolism is the language of the soul because it lends itself to imagination, to thought and association, and intuition and so on.     It is simultaneously stable; it is permanent; it is an object; it is a material thing.  It is delineated that way.  But at the same time it is flexible, as we said a few minutes ago. 

            In fact, if we look at the artifacts of humanity that have been ……… we have a history in solid forms of the history of the consciousness of humanity.  If we probe and analyze with psyche the choice of symbols that we have are important.  They indicate what is going on.  They are like the symbols that are in the dream.  So it is easy to see from all of this why a psychotherapist of this type loves symbols and they love symbolism.  And it is something that is very valuable, because it gives you something definite to focus upon. 

             However, this kind of psychology or psychotherapy was born in materialism.  And whether we like it or not the symbols are material; they are objects; they are things.   We have been used to materialism so long that we have gotten into the habit of thinking that materialism is the reality.  We think that everything comes out of matter.  I am not trying to put down materialism.  I am not putting down analytical psychology that is basic in materialism.  The only thing I am trying to do is contrast it with spiritual development.  Because spiritual development is ………  And it does away with the symbol and goes to what we normally get from the other side of the symbol. 

            You perceive (can see) or this is like being released from prison.  You are no longer looking for just the little chinks in the wall, you are on the other side.  But even for us as mystical aspirants, symbolism can be helpful.  Analytical psychology can be helpful.  I have benefited a lot from it and I continue to read in it and think in it.  It is a very valuable thing.  But there has to be a realization that it is not enough in itself.  Alone it is not enough.  You can do it without analytical psychology.  We have, for example, from the …………..  In the first volume we have the stories or the histories of the desert monks who just had it out with themselves and all of the demons of their own thinking and they directly went at it until they made a breakthrough and had direct spiritual experiences on the other side. 

            They did not have any psychology.  They talked about the sex demon being, and the food demon being and all that, and they literally could see them because they were objectifications of their own consciousness externally.  But they did it without any psychology.  When you are trying to grow spiritually symbolism and analytic psychology can be a great adjunct to that process.  You can have tools that give some intellectual understanding of the workings of the psyche even before you enter it.  But you cannot do it by psychology alone because these occupations with psychology in itself are stuck in the mechanism and you are not getting to the spiritual reality of it.  It is like trying to see through water and constantly stirring up the water with the stick that you are trying to see through.  It is that kind of impossibility. 

            Some materialistic symbolists, such as Carl Jung, benefited inner lives by using symbolism.  But it also deterred them at the same time.  Carl Jung had great problems in seeing spiritual reality because he was bound and determined to make Analytical Psychology a material science like all of the other material sciences.  He has this marvelous book that has one major flaw that contaminates the whole thing.  It is the book on synchronicity.  He talks about how things happen in parallel in all the different worlds, but he says there is no vehicle that passes through all of these different worlds, because if there were there would be magic, and we all know there is no magic.

            I did not know that there is not any magic.  The fact of it is that there is.  Now he eschewed the mysticism because he was trying to establish Analytical Psychology.  (But probably if he psychoanalyzed himself deeply he could see that there was perhaps a reason to that.)  Because he was not like the desert monks and he probably would have had to change his thoughts and sacrifice a lot of his personal things that were his own idols that we all have to do.  If he had become a mystic, mystics do have a high regard for symbolism.   Max Heindel who founded the Rosicrucian Fellowship did.  But the symbolism was all for other things.  We use it to understand other things that we cannot get to otherwise. 

            But it is not completely for that.  Our intent is full waking consciousness in the spiritual worlds.  That cannot be attained symbolically, because the symbol is something material and it is by its very nature limiting, and by its nature what would come though.  The hierophants of the ancient mystery schools knew this.   They had a very wise statement.  A symbol conceals as much as it reveals.  A symbol conceals as much as it reveals.  

            Symbols are filters as much as they are lenses.  It is that filtration that is irksome to us if we want the whole truth.  In turning now to the principle of push from the past we now have to look deeper at how we come to Aquarian freedom.  In the quickness of spiritual intuition or even in the thought process, we can see that change in the material world comes exceedingly slow.  It comes as slow as evolution seems to go.  Or that geology seems to change.  Now that is good for developing the patience and patience is a big part of it.  But it is not good for the sense of emergency. 

            Against impulses we have to run the race.  And the more we become attuned to our spiritual nature the more vital and vibrant it becomes and the more it becomes crucial.  It becomes important; it is an emergency that we make the changes.  Our selfishness and our self-centeredness blinds us as much as materialism does.  So we have to learn the lessons over, again and again.  We are enslaved by all of the material things, because it takes much more time to correct a mistake than if you had done it slowly, not made the mistake in the first place. 

            Materialism blindness also creates impedimental illusions.  The material world is not an illusion as some think.  But some of our views about it are.  Our views are formed in matter and not in the wisdom behind the matter.  So the very slow changing of things we see is like the solids, like rock.  Rock solid is the word that we use, it never seems to change.  In our insecurity we cling to constancy, to these material things. 

            We have insecurity because we are away from the spirit.  If we were completely spiritual we would not have any insecurity.  And so we cling to the very things that are repressing our spirituality.  We, like the prisoners, want to stay in the prison.  And we are even like horses.  Horses: if the stable starts burning, you have to take the horses out of the stable and you have to hold onto them.  Because they will run right back into the stable; that is where they have their security.  So in our slowness we have a lot of unredeemed actions.  And relative to the emergency of spiritual growth it seems like we are falling behind all the time.  The burden of sin seems heavier and heavier. 

            Now there is either one way of looking at repression or in Christian mysticism there are different ways of looking at it.  There is one way that mystics and materialistic analytical psychologists agree about the nature of repression.  And that is that the stuff of what is repressed we call the unconscious or we call it the spiritual worlds and it is alive.    It is unredeemed thoughts, desires, things that may have happened many years ago.  If you bring them to the surface of consciousness they are as alive as the moment in which they were created.  I have never spoken with a psychologist that did not marvel at this.   Because it just happens; wham (!) it’s just so alive.  People can relive experiences that happened decades ago just as though they were there again. 

            I have spoken on the matter that thoughts are things, not only just things, but living things.  They are very vivid and they have a living power to do things.  Thoughts and desires have very long-lived potency, and we have had a general accumulation of power from our experience.  Just from the experience alone we have soul power and we have accumulated a lot of thoughts along the way so that there is a lot of information that is repressed content inside of us.  The more something is repressed the more potency it has. 

            The longer we continue with our materialism, the longer we increase the potency and the creativity of what happens inside of us.  The ironic thing is that the materialism that denied the spiritual worlds by its repressive qualities actually makes the manifestation of the material worlds possible.  There is a lovely poet by the name of David Whyte who talks about this process inwardly.  He talks about repressed images that get pushed down and down almost like geological strata until they become very potent.

 And then they come up as something new.  Manifestations of them become highly creative.  It’s what is happening inside of our selves.  Sometimes they burst out and we cannot control them anymore even if we want to.

            I remember at one time living at a retreat center where there was a lady who all of her life worked three jobs.  She was a very deep spiritual seeker and was very conscientious about it, and then she decided to retire. Huge mistake.  When she decided to retire she was not thinking about the amount of energy she expended in all of the work that she was doing.  Suddenly everything just burst out and she went completely crazy; very erratic behavior.  But things do not have to burst out.  Some people believe that symbols are a gateway for repressed content, and they certainly can do that. 

            But they are limiting.  What happens is that we create new symbols for our conditions, but we have just extended the repression in a different way.  In the pictorial Zodiac there are the tails of two fishes.  And the two fishes are tied together.  They restrain each other.  It’s not surprising to consider this a symbol of repression.  In fact Carl Jung is aware of that and even as a materialist he saw that the fish coming to the surface were looking for clear air and that is what the transition from the Age of Pisces to the Age of Aquarius is all about—even though he [Carl Jung] perpetuated the Age of Pisces.  You really cannot be hard on him because he did such wonderful things. 

            But we cannot continue to live under the burden of sin.  We cannot continue to live under the superstition of materialism.  We cannot deny and repress what is within us.  We are told that the secrets that have been from the foundation of time will be shouted from the rooftops.  And they must be aired, they must be shouted.  We cannot continue to maintain materialism and other illusions even though they might be very secure. 

            The whale of the Leviathan is also in Pisces, and it is going to surface.  When it does it is going to surface with great power.  The transition from being locked in materialism to waking up is going to be a burst.  It is going to be a burst of relief, like Aquarian release that makes minor human sublimation seem like child’s play.  If we persist in our inner work we will have the ability to transmute this energy and do a lot of good for the entire creation as well as ourselves.  If we do not persist in our inner work–those who do not persist in their inner work or those who use inner work to gain control for themselves there will probably be insanity. 

            We already have a third of humanity in the United States – a third of the people are depressed.  We are talking about the stuff of spiritual potency.  And it is potent.  It creates, sustains, changes and dissolves the whole creation.  So as we drop our illusions and the other things that we use to repress ourselves, we can see clearly that we have power to make changes.  We can even do this when we practice clairvoyance—material-world clairvoyance, which just means clear seeing; when we see a tree as a tree, and for its own life.  We look at it as a tree which we do not always do.  It’s a kind of material clairvoyance.  We normally think about its shape or timber or firewood—something like that.  But we need to see things for their own sake.  And when we see things for their own sake, then we see how they fit into the universe apart from that subjective selfish way that we have come to look at things. 

            Clairvoyance literally means clear seeing.  We can begin to do this right now.  Even though we walk down the street we can do it.  And when we do that we can use the soul material that we have bound up in our illusions about things.  The beautiful thing about it is when we dissolve our superstitions we dissolve our own monsters.  And we do not create new ones in their place.  We see things as they are.  These are things that we can do; we can understand the monsters of our own being.  If we look at retrospection and we look at what we have done day by day and if we look at the full implications of what we have done,  we can see that sometimes we are not very pretty people.  It’s no wonder that we are not entrusted with divine creative powers, because we would probably abuse them in the same way that we abuse life in the little sins that we do every day. 

            From what we know about astrology and other tools, we can see how we transmute.  Astrology itself was a big problem.  We cannot do astrology the way it used to be done.  We cannot even look at astrology too symbolically.  If you notice—in all of these talks, when we mention something astrological we try to drop the astrology, we try to look on the other side of the symbol and the reality that the symbol points to.  The only valid way of studying astrology is to use it as a focus for reality and then focus on the reality.  It is one of the problems.  I don’t even know how to give talks like this without relating them to this world and all of the depressing things that we have in this world.  The time for symbolism may not be over yet, but it’s certainly on its way out. 

            There was the man that was called the Teutonic philosopher whose name was Jacob Boehme [1575-1624].  He was a great seer.    He knew the Bible almost by heart.  And as much as he knew and loved the Bible, all he had to say was that the time is now – that we do away with the Bible and that we see the spiritual glories in heaven and the divine beings straightforward without relying on the limited archaic text.  Something of that is what the Jacobeans said.  And that was hundreds of years ago. 

            His statement is just the converse of the statement of St. Paul that we began this talk with.  St. Paul talked about losing our spiritual vision, that in selfishness [we are] focusing more and more into matter in our point of view.   Whereas the Jacobean view is to liberate ourselves from the Bible and other symbols and look at spiritual reality straightforward. 

            In modern spirituality, like the Rosicrucian philosophy, we have the tools to accomplish this.  We have retrospection through which we can dissolve all of the things that we have pardoned in our character.  And we have, then, nothing impeding us from seeing in the spiritual worlds.  We are not looking through those snakes in our aura or those other kinds of monsters that we are creating in our own being.  The effect of retrospection is the liquidation of our entire past destiny.  And it must be complete and thorough. 

            We must dissolve the good things that we have done as well as all of the terrible things we have done.  It is possible to have and be carrying a burden of virtue as well as a burden of sin.  What we want to be is liquid.  We want to be living right now, instantaneous, in the moment.  In the Rosicrucian philosophy there is another exercise that is given.  It is a means for opening up first-time clairvoyance.  One imagines and one holds an object of imagination before one’s attention for as long as possible and as clearly as possible.  Rosicrucian students usually visualize the white rose toward which they direct inner energy.  That image is held so strong that other people can almost see it.  And when you drop it, it is like dropping the superstition into the void.  It is like dropping the misbelief that you have.  You can then see into spiritual worlds.  And when we do it is a surprise.  In fact, it is so surprising that sometimes you go back to the other consciousness because you do not know that it has really happened.  Aquarius is a surprise.   Aquarius is surprise.  Relative to the repression of Pisces and the Age of Pisces, what is coming to us is going to be a gigantic surprise.  You tell that to people and it is such a wonderful surprise that it does not even spoil it for them.  One never believes that things are as wonderful as they really are.  So we have emotional pressure, we have pressure from repression, and we have pressure from the gradual build-up of soul power.  And they are all pushing us forward. 

            If we are aware of those things in ourselves, and if our spiritual lives become more and more vivid, rather than more and more prosaic because we have become accustomed to them, we can take the energy and do very vital things.  And we can direct it.  We can use it.  Even if we cannot free ourselves from the prison of the body, we can direct the energy into healing.  We can use the divine.  We can use the power to reach out and take our divine inheritance of which St. Paul speaks.    Since Pisces (and the twelfth house) is the sign of involuntary service, it is the sign of duty.  We are not talking only about something that is voluntary.  This is our duty. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John William Waterhouse Portrays A Myth Of Good And Evil

John William Waterhouse Portrays A Myth Of Good And Evil

 

Hypermnestra, in Greek mythology, was the daughter of Danaus. Danaus was the twin brother of Aegyptus and son of Belus. He had fifty daughters, the Danaides, and Aegyptus had fifty sons. Aegyptus commanded that his sons marry the Danaides and Danaus fled to Argos, ruled by King Pelasgus. When Aegyptus and his sons arrived to take the Danaides, Danaus gave them to spare the Argives the pain of a battle. However, he instructed his daughters to kill their husbands on their wedding night. Forty-nine followed through, but one, Hypermnestra refused because her husband, Lynceus, honored her wish to remain a virgin. Danaus was angry with his disobedient daughter and threw her to the Argive courts. Aphrodite intervened and saved her. Lynceus later killed Danaus as revenge for the death of his brothers. Lynceus and Hypermnestra then began a dynasty of Argive kings (the Danaan Dynasty), beginning with Abas. In some versions of the legend, the Danaides were punished in the underworld by being forced to carry water through a jug with holes, or a sieve, so the water always leaked out. Hypermnestra, however, went straight to  Elysium. Hypermnestra was also the daughter of  Thestios and Eurythemis. Her sisters are Althia and Leda. With her husband Oicles, she had a son  named Amphiarus, who later took part in the war of the Seven Against Thebes.    (from Wikipedia)

ON GOOD AND EVIL

The following is a talk on Good and Evil

by Willie Weidemann 

from the Madison Fellowship of the Spirit

Annual Conclave

May 2009

 

If God is all-good and all-powerful, why does He allow evil to exist in the world?  This is a question that has baffled many people throughout history.  Some people attempt to solve this problem with Atheism; the belief that there is no God.  Others believe God exists, but there is no evil.  Still others think that God’s power is limited and all the evil things that happen are steps in God’s development.  However, I don’t believe any of these proposed solutions are correct.  I will argue in favor of a fourth possible answer to the question of evil called the Free-Will solution. 

            One of the main claims of this solution is that God has created humans with free will. We have the freedom to choose what we want.  In most cases this is true.  An example of free will would be Gandhi fasting because he wanted to save India.  He had the ability to choose if he wanted to fast or not.  However, in certain unique circumstances, a person does not have free will.  An example of such an instance would be somebody fasting because they are in the desert and there is no food.  In this situation, a person’s only option is fasting.

            While the Free-Will solution holds that there is a God, it still maintains that there is evil in the world as well.  Humans are responsible for the evil that is in the world.  We have free will to choose whether to do good things or bad things.  At this point, one might inquire as to why God did not create us as more intelligent beings and less prone to doing bad things.  Those who believe in the Free-Will solution might respond by saying the following:  When we get tempted by bad things, God is not tempting us.  God does not tempt anyone.  Instead, the temptations come from our own minds.  God gave us free will so that we may learn through experience and find the truth. 

What happens to us as a result of resisting or succumbing to these temptations is called the principle of cause and effect.  An important saying for believers of the Free-Will solution is a Bible verse from Paul’s letter to the Galatians.  “Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap” (Galatians 6:7).  In other words, everything is an effect of a previous cause.  All things happen because of something we have done or have not done in the past.  At this point, one may find several flaws in these claims.  These flaws could raise the following questions:  If it is true that one reaps what one sows, then one might ask what happens is this situation: A person plants some beans and a fire comes across their land, destroying the crop.  In this situation the person can’t reap what he sows.  How can everything be the result of our own actions?  How does one explain innocent people dying in a car accident or a natural disaster? 

There are some people who find the answer to these questions in the concept of reincarnation.  They believe that if a person just dies and turns into ashes, they cannot reap what they have sown in their life.  As such, it is believed that the spirit continues to exist after the body has died.  In addition, believers in reincarnation say that the spirit retains all our skills and talents that we have accumulated during our life.  The purpose for this is so that when people are reborn, they can continue developing and perfecting what they started in their past life.  Thus, people are able to reap what they have sown in a previous existence.  Believers in reincarnation have a similar explanation for what takes place when an individual dies in a car accident or natural disaster.  They say this seemingly unfortunate event was caused by something the individual did or did not do in a previous existence.  As a result of these past actions, the individual or his family had to learn something by experiencing a horrific death.  Another explanation of this is that, at the time of the incident, the individual had learned all he needed to learn from this life experience.  Thus, he or she was ready to move on.  However, many people may find it hard to grasp this concept of cause and consequence through reincarnation.  “With their own limited vision, people cannot see when or how the Law of Sowing and Reaping operates, and so they conclude that it must not be true” (Elsa Glover, Rays from the Rose Cross 1986 p 443). 

In summary, there have been several proposed solutions to the problem of evil.  I have argued that the Free-Will solution is the most accurate and most plausible of them.  God does not give us free will knowing that we will make bad decisions and cause suffering.  Instead, God gives us the opportunity to learn what is right through our worldly experiences.  In addition, the Free-Will solution gives up neither God (good) nor evil.  It maintains that they both exist.  If there was no evil in the world, then there would be no free will.  People would not have to choose right from wrong and good from bad because everything would be good.  Accordingly, both good and evil are necessary in the world in which we live.  In the words of Greek Stoic philosopher Chrysippus, “…good and evil being contrary, both are necessary since each sustains the other”

Fox Ngandu Badibanga

image0011  Fox Ngandu, who lives in Los Angeles, came to the United States from The Democratic Republic of Congo in 2002 at the invitation of The Rosicrucian Fellowship.  He worked in the French-language section of the Esoteric Department and also worked for the Education Department in both the English and French languages.  Fox devotes much of his personal time to correcting the lessons of students who enroll in the Fellowship’s correspondence courses.  Now, his first book, a science fiction story titled, Global Warming and Al Gore Faustus, Adventures Inside The Earth, gives a new perspective and insights that will surprise everyone except students of Western Wisdom as he sympathetically considers our endangered Earth, the host that sustains us.fox-book-23 

 

Fox Ngandu Badibanga 

 

 ER       o  Where did you end up having your book published?  Did you find a competitive printer or publisher near Los Angeles? 

 

 Fox      o  The book is published by BooksOnDemand.com, the Wisconsin company you recommended to me. Thanks! 

 

 ER       o  What inspired you to write a book of this type?  You were living in the Democratic Republic of Congo when you got the idea.  How did the idea develop through the years in Congo, and later as you left Congo, and moved to the USA and California

 

 Fox      o  Three events inspired me to write this book. First, in 1993, the Congolese government decided to make the day of December 5th a Day For Trees.  As I was at school at that time, we were asked to plant a tree in order to make the city green and clean. Since then, every December 5th has become Tree Day in Congo. December 5th is my birthday and that event became part of my birthday. I was proud of it.

             Second, in 2000, while I was working for the governement of the Congo, my boss offered me membership in an Environmental Non Profit Organization. I become the Outreach Manager for that group whose goals were to eliminate the mountains of plastic, paper and other waste products by recycling them, and therefore clean the city and the environment. My work was to meet with various members, most of them well placed people and officials, and to explain to them the purpose of the organization. Meanwhile, I became Assistant to my boss at the University of Kinshasa teaching International Law and Environmental Law. My interest in the environment was growing deeper and deeper. Learning how the greenhouse functions was the most interesting piece of information that finally triggered my mind to think along this line. Adding to this was my natural curiosity to know beyond the visible things, the invisible!

             Third, was The Rosicrucian Cosmo Conception by Max Heindel. It is true that I have been reading this book since I was 15 years old, but it was only during my involvement with environmental issues that one day I was able to connect the scientific information on global warming to the information I had learned from the Cosmo Conception. At that point, my child-like dreaming, the Cosmo Conception, and the scientific information about the Earth and the environment found their expression in an idea to write a book. But the events of my life were running very fast.  I moved to the USA in 2002, and I waited until the time came when I started putting ideas together. The most amazing thing is that from mid 2007 until the time I finished the book in December 2008, I was very worried about the uncertainties of my life. Stress, loneliness, things not going the way I wanted them to go; I became tired and more frustrated than I’ve ever been in my life with fear for the future, guilt from the past, anxiety for the present etc., but when my mind calmed down I was able to have clear ideas, and these are now in the book. I was able to connect seemingly irrelevant pieces of information to each other. I am sure God was visiting me during these hard but inspiring times.

 ER       o  And what do you hope to achieve with this book? 

 

 Fox      o  The most dreamed-for achievement for this book, what I hope for, would be to bring forth a new and clear understanding of what the earth really is: a living being with feelings, memory and spirit — to get humanity to realize that as a whole we are the Spirit of the Earth and the Earth is our treasure which we all need to cherish and protect.

 ER       o  How did you become aware of the impact of global warming?

 

 Fox      o  This will make you laugh, but it was the best evidence that humans cause global warming: In August 2002, I arrived on the beautiful grounds called Mount Ecclesia which was full of flowers, green trees and blooming life. A year later, a fight for power began ravaging Mount Ecclesia‘s administration. The messages of love and friendship were changed into slogans of hatred, discrimination, conspiracy. I stood there and witnessed a falling of an almost century old empire. Then the land that was green became grey, dry and dead. Plants and flowers died as the division and hatred grew. Even the watering and nourishing of these plants could not stop the burning. It was like a fire inside the land was set up to burn and kill all that lived there. Even the small animals we were accustomed to seeing on the grounds had become scarce. What happened?  Yes, I saw and witnessed the impact of global warming! The book talks about the causes.

 ER       o  So, how do you feel now about the changes in your life as you look back over the past 10 years?

 

 Fox      o  I feel like a human being. Looking back over the last 10 years, I feel like if I had known what was coming I would have wished I was never born.  At the same time, I feel more confident than ever. I have gone from illusions about life to a realization of the realities. I have learned to face my fears. I have learned to live with and love them, for only then can I transmute them.

 ER       o  Do you have plans to write another book?   What topic?

 

 Fox      o  Yes, I have 3 other projects: one on the future of the human race, a second on humanity’s addiction to war and third on the life of a legal, then illegal, immigrant.

 ER       o  You practiced law in the Congo and planned to gain credentials to practice in the U.S.  Is this still an objective?  How does USA law and the judicial system differ from that in the Congo

 

 Fox      o  Yes, I have a few more classes to resume before graduating with JD [Juris Doctorate].  I had to suspend my classes for a few months due to financial hardship and stress. I will resume soon.

             The main differences between US and Congolese judicial systems are that US is common law while Congo is civil law, US has the federal system while Congo has a unitary one.

ER       o Can you explain these terms or elaborate?

Fox      o The difference between civil law and common law lies not just in the mere fact of codification, but in the methodological approach to codes and statutes. In civil law countries, legislation is seen as the primary source of law. By default, courts thus base their judgments on the provisions of codes and status, from which solutions in particular cases are to be derived. Courts thus have to reason extensively on the basis of general rules and principles of the code, often drawing analogies from statutory provisions to fill lacunae and to achieve coherence. By contrast, in the common law system, cases are the primary source of law, while statutes are only seen as incursions into the common law and thus interpreted narrowly.

            The main differences between a unitary and a federalism governement lie more on the extent of presidential and congressional powers vis-a-vis local governments. In the unitary form, the President has really vast powers. He exercises control and supervision of all local governments–regional, provincial, city, municipal etc…They can be removed with or without cause. They are considered the alter egos of the President. Thus, the President has under him the entire local governments, all military and police forces, all tax collection agencies, all fiscal agencies (banks), all health agencies, all prosecution agencies, all health and social welfare agencies, all natural resources agencies and labor. He can also declare war and national emergencies and use emergency and military powers during war, rebellion, revolution and terrorism.

            But, the philosophy of law is universal.

 ER       o  You incorporated some Western Wisdom philosophy in the book.  How did you become acquainted with the Rosicrucian teachings and the Rosicrucian Fellowship? 

 

 Fox      o  I became acquainted with the Western Wisdom Philosophy when I was about 15 years old. I read the Cosmo Conception, then all of the other books by Max Heindel and the RF.  I worked for the RF and I love the teaching. I am still grading lessons online.

 ER       o  Did Al Gore ever respond to you?  (I am assuming that you contacted him as you said you intended to.)  If so, what did he say? 

 

 Fox      o  I have not contacted him yet. I will now do so by sending him a copy of my book.

 ER       o  Do you still plan to write a children’s version of the book? 

 

 Fox      o  Yes, I am working on it. I will let you know when it is ready.

 ER       o  What would you do with your life if there were no limitations? 

 

 Fox      o  Have as many experiences as possible. Always worship God, endeavor to be a good person and be helpful to my fellow humans and to nature.

 

Global Warming and Al Gore Faustus Adventures inside the Earth can be ordered at:

http://www.amazon.com/Global-Warming-Faustus-Adventures-inside/dp/0615289673/
 

AA Lecture 6b

Microcosm Lecture Series Notes

 Transitioning Into The Aquarian Age

 Lecture 6b of 25 by [R]

 Some Thoughts On Altruism

[Editor’s Note: All portrait thumbnail illustrations are editorial content, not part of the lecture]

                         We have seen all along in this and previous talks that the spirit when it is manifest is three-fold.  There is divine spirit which is the power and will.  There is life spirit which we’ve been talking about a lot which is the light and the truth, the life and the creative love of the three-fold spirit.  And there is the human spirit which is not only the thinker; it is the doer, the generator and all of those things.  In effect, without too much technicality, spirit reflectively projects its dream for what is known within itself into potential.  Into what could be but what is not yet.  This unknown or ignorance is congealed as the various states of matter – the different worlds in macrocosm.               

             In the process it is a three-fold activity.  There is the materialization of spirit which is the manifestation of the dream.  There is the spiritualization of matter which is taking the dream and making it real and incorporating it into spirit.  And the third process is the evolution of consciousness which is a consequence of the other two actions.  Now, in that second-named process, which is the spiritualization of matter, the spirit works on the matter.  It doubts the illusory nature of its own projection into the unknown, into the ignorance of things.  The essence of that experience, that was within potential, the essence of that, becomes soul material, and that soul material is absorbed and processed and assimilated into the spirit and then it is spiritualized.  It is made real, and we won’t go into that right now.  A little later we’ll get into that a little more deeply.  We want to be more practical now.  This process is carried out in us in microcosm in our vehicles of consciousness which is where, even if we’re just metabolizing, we are spiritualizing matter.  We are great alchemists whether we know it or not.

            I only want to talk about one part of this.  In the reflective projection, the life spirit is projected reflectively into the etheric subdivision of the physical world.  The etheric subdivision of the physical world is composed of four ethers:  the chemical ether which has to do with chemical reactions and stable form; the life ether which has to do with vitalization, growth and procreation, etc; the light ether which is responsible for taking sense perception and carrying it into the spiritual worlds and taking intuitive impulses from the spiritual worlds and bringing them into the physical; finally there is what is called the reflecting ether and it has two functions.  On one pole it has the function of memory.  That is its receptive pole.   As its positive, active pole it ramifies thoughts.  I’m going very fast here.  There’s loads and loads we could say about this, but this would last all night.

            So, basically, within our etheric constitution there are four ethers and they are divided into two different kinds of activities.  There are the biological ethers which are the chemical and life ethers which take care of biological business, and there are the soul ethers, the light ether and the reflecting ether.  It is those that our spiritual development takes place in.  By enriching our soul bodies, that is, by attracting the stuff of the two higher ethers and incorporating them into our etheric aura it becomes the vehicle of consciousness in which we exist when we leave the dense physical body.  There is no limit to how much we can draw to ourselves of the two higher ethers.  The more we have of them, the clearer our consciousness is.  You can always tell a soulful person by how clear he is in his consciousness and by how things from him are easily understood.

            We build our soul bodies by using them, by attracting them.   The most essential thing in this is the light ether.  At the negative pole of the light ether the perception takes place.  Every time that we are very astute in our perceptions or give ourselves to observing things, the more we attract to ourselves, the light ether through the negative pole.   The other pole is even more important, because the positive pole of the light ether is what warms and drives the blood.  The life spirit drives the blood through the light ether in the blood stream.  This means that the more we use our bodies to serve other people, the more we drive our circulation in service to other people, the more we have of the light ether.  The more we have of the soul material, especially the light ether, in our soul body determines how altruistic we are.  A person who is not soulful in this regard cannot understand what altruism is.  You cannot learn altruism.  You cannot practice altruism.  You can only live it, and it’s when you live a life of service [that] you have the stuff on which the intuitions which come from the realm of altruism reflect themselves or manifest themselves.  There is no other way.  You cannot buy altruism.

            We can see in a very practical way how we can develop the capacity for altruism.  It isn’t just sitting around and smiling lovingly at each other, although that is some of it.  We can love other people and in loving and smiling and sharing those smiles we do attract a small amount of ethers to ourselves, but it’s mostly by sacrificing in loving self-forgetting service that we attract the stuff of altruism.

            To some extent all of this is unnecessary, because altruism manifests immediately as soon as we are soulful.  There is no way that we can have a lot of light ether and not be altruistic.  However, the effects of using spiritual exercises such as retrospection and the other exercises that we have in actually organizing and attracting and building this into our soul body is quite appreciable.  So, we could sit around and smile at each other, but that’s not the way.

            Now we want to understand a little better about not practicing altruism but coming to altruism and realizing it when it is there.  Most of us are not very spontaneous people, and for that we look at some simple keywords from Aquarius. Anticipation, surprise, spontaneity; they are all Aquarius, Uranus keywords.    If we watch a spontaneous artist like a jazz musician, we get some idea of it.  Many people practice music and they develop virtuosity and they can express emotion.  They are familiar with the music, but very few create spontaneously, because spontaneous creation is something else.  Many musicians do practice all kinds of music.

            A few years ago, we had an artist-in-residence here that was world famous for his spontaneity.  His name was Buiner Johannsen, and he would sit down and spontaneously, for an hour and a half, write or play out of his head.  J. S. Bach was another one who created spontaneously.  In the musical offering he sat down at the organ and composed a perpetual fugue, and not a simple one at that.  And then we have musicians like John Coltrane. They are spontaneous creators.  What happens to most of us is that we’re so ground into our daily lives, our humdrum habits, and our closed consciousness that we aren’t open for surprise. It is, indeed, a sign of Aquarian consciousness to not think overly much of self but to realize that within oneself one can be surprised.  If we think as though there is an answer and if we play music as though there is another note that will carry our idea further we are practicing spontaneous creation.  The key to it is anticipation.  We anticipate, but we can be intuitive, but we can be spontaneous creators, so we understand that when we have the soul material it’s available to us.  But, to utilize the soul material we have to learn to anticipate spontaneous creation.

John Coltrane

John Coltrane

             Discovery is like that.  Discovery comes to people who think and think and they believe there is a truth to be discovered.  If we think there’s nothing there, we have closed ourselves to discovery.  The process of experiencing spontaneous creation, of experiencing altruism by anticipation or by surprise is a very subtle process.  It is told to us several times by the biblical Christ, and when a being that great repeats something several times, it’s important.  The biblical Christ says, “The kingdom of heaven comes as a thief in the night.  We have to be watchful; we have to be subtle; we have to be welcoming.  Otherwise it can be passing right by us, and we don’t know it’s there.

            This means letting go – letting go of habits – letting go of our own opinions about things.  Our opinions about things block us from experiencing new things.  Our opinions may be perfectly fine, but if we’re attached to them they’re impedimental.  We have to let go and open our consciousness.  Not to something outside of ourselves; that’s what leads to mediumship or things like that; but we have to let go of the way we’ve always looked at things and look for new things within ourselves.  The beautiful thing about this, if you’ve ever had intuitions or spontaneous experiences, is that all the things that you were hanging on to so dearly before – almost all of them are not lost.  Sometime they’re overturned.  They’re still true, just as true.  Sometimes you can even see them in a whole new light.  It’s a matter of letting go of personal identification with the things in our consciousness.

            So, we can’t practice altruism, but we can anticipate it.  We anticipate it in the same way we anticipate meeting our friends.  We know we’re going to have a good time when we get together with our friends.  We anticipate that.  So, once again that’s going back and forth between self-forgetting and self-remembering.  Now that we’ve looked at altruism through the negatives, we’re ready to move on to looking at altruism through the positives.

            Let’s begin by looking at another very peculiar quality of Aquarius.  Earlier we said that Aquarius and the eleventh house represented things that were done for themselves.  Now let’s look at things in themselves.  Plato was a great Aquarian transcendentalist and he talked about apperceiving things in themselves.  That is, he talked about perceiving wholes.  Perceiving wholes where all of the perceptions or all of the details are seen as one.  One is not looking at those, but one is experiencing the whole.  In doing this he talked about a science of sciences; a science that knows all things, including itself.  This, mathematicians would recognize as a set of sets.  Mozart was another Aquarian and he had total perception of the region of archetypes, in the region of concrete thought.  He could see the archetype that could be expressed as a symphony in a fraction of a second; as a whole. 

 

Socrates

Socrates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plato

Plato

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mozart

Mozart

 

 

 

 

 

            You and I are not Socrates or Plato or Mozart, but it’s helpful for us if we start thinking in wholes, and we can do that by beginning where we are and looking at parts with respect to the wholes that they create or that they are subsets of.  The astrological mandala is  a symbol of the whole of the universe.  One of the simplest ways to understand any one of the signs of the zodiac is to understand it in terms of its opposite.  When you understand a thing in terms of its opposite, you understand that as a pole which is a whole in itself, and in this regard to understand something through its opposite is to understand it through complementation.  This is like saying, Aries is the opposite of Libra, and Aries is the drive to move forward, and the drive to move forward is complemented by balance.  One cannot really go forward unless one is balanced.  That’s the lesson that you learn when you ride a bicycle.  You can ride a bicycle “no hands” if you’re moving forward at a good clip, even if you don’t have a good sense of balance, but if you stand with the bicycle and you’re not going forward it’s very hard to balance, so balance facilitates forward motion and forward motion facilitates motion.  There is a complementation.

            Now, Leo is usually said to represent personal love and Aquarius to represent impersonal love.  I don’t like that choice of words.  Probably a better choice of words is individual love for Leo and altruistic love for Aquarius.  The question that we are looking at now in positive through complementation is: does individual love fulfill altruistic love in the same way that balance fulfills forward motion or forward motion, balance.   Cats are Leonine, and they’re big on individual love, provided they’re the one that is loved.  They don’t sacrifice any dignity in receiving individual love.  They don’t fawn and slobber like a dog does.  The point is within individual love and in Leo (Leo is like the Sun) is that there is a simple, central focus; a central focus for love, just like there is a central focus of light for the Sun.

            Some philosophers believe that the Sun was and is lit up by the divine beings that comprise the constellation of the zodiac.  And that the fuller system is really the womb and that the light’s projected and that is what lights the Sun.  If we focus our positive attention on an individual, and really penetrate into the very core of being of that individual, we can’t help but to love them, and that love of what they really are in their essential being is key to altruism.  There are would-be altruists who are in love with the idea of altruism and have a vague and kind of nebulous conception of humanity, but they can’t stand the kind of people who are around them.  Love is objective.  It is not vague or nebulous.  We want to be loved as ourselves and each of us, in our self, and even further in our being, is divine.  Each of us is a unique expression of altruism.

            We can see by looking at the unique qualities of each single human being, one has a peep-hole into the life spirit of which that individual is an expression, and that is a peep-hole into the light of altruism.  The character of each individual is a variant of the character of all selves, the self of selves, or the selfness of selves.  So, altruism and the humanity that is an embodiment of it is not a diffuse sentiment.  It is a whole and it has a character and although that character is so good in this life that we cannot always understand it, it is lovable just as each individual expression of it is lovable.

            Every time we encounter an individual, if we do so with anticipation and look at it as an opportunity to love, both the whole individual and the whole gets lit up by that.  That’s what we do with our friends.  We don’t go to our friends and think we’re going to get a bad reception.  We go there for an opportunity to love them, so maybe, if we do sit and look at each other and smile and pass a dollar back and forth between us, maybe there is some altruism that can come from that

            Now the principle of fulfillment for the opposite and of the extreme beginning other extremes is not new.  It was first stated, at least in the Western world, by Paraclitis of Pontia and it found its way a few years ago into the analytic psychology of Carl Jung where it was called ……….. and it’s something that can be taken deeper.  This is my vanity.  You know, I have to trump the ace with Paraclitis and Jung.

Carl Jung

Carl Jung

             In the astrological mandala the houses can be seen as abstract derivatives of the ideas of the signs.  That is to say the fifth house if gifts or children, whereas the fifth sign, Leo, is the attitude of generosity or the attitude of giving off.  In a similar way, the signs of the intellectual zodiac are abstract derivatives of the constellational zodiac, that is, the sidereal zodiac.  The constellations are formed of great spiritual beings working together collectively and individually, not only in their particular stars but collectively working together and radiating into the solar system.  Their being and their right is much more than what we see with our eyes or with our telescopes.  It is an intelligible life which is creative.  They literally focus their being into the solar room.  Now, in the very first talk and the second talk we talked about how the interactions between the sidereal and intellectual zodiacs, by the precession of the equinoxes, shows great changes in historical things.  We can add to that fact that with each zodiacal constellation there is a hierarchy of divine beings.

            Associated with the constellations of Leo is a hierarchy of beings that is called “The Lords of The Flame.”  When we speak about our evolutionary creation, we’re speaking about something that is much grander and deeper than what material cosmogonists (or cosmologists) talk about.  We’re talking about something that goes way beyond the big bang and that fifteen-million years. The materialists are only dealing with the outer skin of things.  The evolutionists, the Darwinian evolutionists are only looking at a recent capitulation.   They’re looking at one inch in the middle of the yard stick.  We know how inches are reflected in the feet of the yards, so it means that this is a very big thing—to look at the evolutionary creation.  We’re talking about a time at the beginning of our solar manifestation.  We’re only talking about the solar manifestation and not at all the other nebulae, galaxies, and such.  We’re talking about a time when the density of our solar system was no more dense than a thought, and the bulk of it was still in the spiritual worlds.  In that early beginning, we were mineral-like.  We passed through a mineral-like stage in which we learned how to take form.  The basic capacity for us to take form was radiated into us by that hierarchy, The Lords of The Flame. 

            Later on in the early beginning, they radiated into our becoming-spiritual being the ability to eventually have the Will-To-Be, the divine spirit.  In the next stage of our solar evolutionary creation when we were passing through a plant-like state and the cosmos was no more deep than a desire, toward the end of that they radiated into us the capacity to have the life spirit that we are talking about with regard to altruism.  Thus we can see that three of our most fundamental states of being, our physical being which is our most highly evolved, our will-to-be and our capacity to truth and to light and to the spirit of life were radiated into us by the hierarchy called “The Lords of The Flame.”

            There are many other hierarchies that participated in our solar cosmos, and mostly they participated with us also.  Each of these hierarchies represents a different rung on Jacob’s Ladder passing into deeper and deeper apotheosis.  Each hierarchy has a character all of its own, depending on the experience that it had during its evolution in the creation.  In terms of their creative accomplishment, all of these hierarchies differ in their power as well as how they go about things.

            In the solar creation, there are three different grades of spiritual hierarchies that we want to talk about.  First of all, there are beings that did not need to participate in our solar cosmos, in our creation, but they did so freely and voluntarily.  They were so highly evolved that they could not participate directly with the creatures, because their level of consciousness was so intense that they would have disintegrated the becoming beings.  These [higher] beings are called the Zenaphim and the Teraphim, and they are associated with the constellations Aries and Taurus.

            The second grade of beings that participated in our solar cosmos also participated freely and voluntarily.  They did not need to; it was not necessary for them to be….what they were or to become what they were becoming, but their evolutionary level was such that they could participate in the distinct individual becoming beings.  They include the Cherubim, the Seraphim and The Lords of The Flame.  The Cherubim are associated with the constellation of Cancer, the Seraphim with Gemini, and as we have already said, The Lords of The Flame are associated with Leo.

            The third category of creative beings are those that participate in the creation because they have to in order to fulfill their commitment to themselves; in order to become what they had to become, they had to participate in the creation.  They include Lords of Wisdom, Lords of Individuality, Lords of Form, Lords of Mind, Archangels, Angels, and our very beginning as Human Beings.  They are particularly associated with Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and we with Pisces.  We’re not talking about horoscopes here.  We’re talking about exalting, creative activity.  We’re talking about exalted beings that have a status and consciousness in evolution that is as far above and beyond us as we are beyond a bacterium.

            We’re trying to get at a principle here, a principle that is important, and the principle is with the first two categories.  The first category, the Zenaphim and Teraphim, were too advanced to work with us directly, so we cannot talk about them.  There is a cosmological principle in that; as we grow in creativity we have a responsibility to share our creativity with other beings.  All beings advance by creating and giving to other beings.

            The second principle is distance, figuratively speaking.  The Teraphim and Zenaphim were too far above us.  If you take an 11-year old, the 11-year old is more likely to follow the example of a 14-year old rather than a 50-year old.  There is that kinship in being closer.  So, we want to talk about the second category of beings—that freely participated, that didn’t have to, who gave of themselves voluntarily, but worked on us directly.   Specifically, we want to look at the Lords of The Flame who gave us that germ of life spirit that made it possible for us to experience love at all, for us to experience altruism at all.  They also gave us the divine spirit and physical body, but that’s not there.  This means they gave us the capacity to take a form of any kind.  We have now evolved that form so that it is quite sophisticated.  They gave us the Will-To-Be, and whether we know it or not, we exist because we will to exist.    The archetype of our life here on earth is set spinning by the will to live, which is built by consciousness soul which comes from our experience here and feeds our divine will, but that’s getting too far afield.

            But, our capacity to love and light and life in spirit is what we’re trying to get at.  What we’re trying to understand now is how the Lords of The Flame could give such fundamental things to us without attachment.  This is central.  Altruism means loving and loving very intensely, but without clinging, without any cling at all.  The best answer to these principles of Leo and Aquarius, for this question, can be found in a simple keyword for each of those two signs of the zodiac or constellations.  They are “freedom” and “giving.” 

            We are told by the biblical Christ, freely have ye received (when you were creatures), now freely give.  He didn’t say just give; give freely.  The Lords of The Flame did not have to participate.  They did so freely, and they did so voluntarily, and because of this they could give of themselves totally without being bounded by necessity.  Anytime there’s necessity, you are limiting your capacity to give.  Anything by coercion, you will do, but you won’t do as much as if you do it in freedom.  Because of this, the Lords of The Flame could give of themselves totally, and when they gave of themselves totally, their selfness, their spirit was given to the other, was given to the dream and was no longer theirs.  When it was given to the dream, even though it takes millions of years for it to be effected, ……… realizes the dream.  The dream is realized when it becomes spiritual reality and not just, “this is my dream, this is what I’d like it to be.”  It happens when something is given totally and without restraint of any kind.  That is how the dream is realized, and that is how matter is spiritualized.

            Now like all deeply spiritual things that are beyond the mind, there are paradoxes, because things beyond the mind, paradoxical opposites meet in a unity.  One paradox most Christians have experienced.  It is: Once we give ourselves completely in freedom and begin to experience the Christ-love, the altruistic love, we become prisoners of it.  We are prisoners of love, and when we love something we can’t help but do what we have to do, no matter what.  So, we have Paul saying, “I, Paul, prisoner of Christ.”

            Another paradox is where we find the principle that we’re seeking at this time.  It is a simple fact that such an activity could only be done by freely giving.  Stated very tritely, it isn’t really a gift unless it is given freely.  This even applies with for-giving, forgiving as in an apology.  Nobody wants an apology that is given half-heartedly or is given begrudgingly.  Apologies for-giving only come when it’s unconditional-giving.

            Beyond these simple, trite kinds of statements, is the difficulty that in the interplay between individual attachment and free-giving, in the interplay between them there are things that run very deep, things that are very hard for us to work with.  For example, Leo and the fifth house rule giving, but they are also the home of the Sun, or the Self and central being, as said earlier.  We have to give up ourselves or we have to give the whole selfness when we give, or else there is attachment. 

             If done spiritually, the Self goes with the gift and it is part of the gift.  Things that people give us aren’t important.  It’s what they, of themselves, have given to us.  It is another trite saying, it isn’t the gift, it’s the thought behind it.  Even though it’s a trite statement, there’s a deep reality behind it.  If the Self is given freely in a gift, it becomes unattached, and it becomes Aquarian-like.

            This is what it means, looking in the other direction, when we give ourselves to Christ.  We still have our individual nature; we still have our selfhood, but when we make that transference, from the whirlpool to the sea, when we give ourselves to Christ, it is an amazingly relieving kind of thing.  We don’t carry that onus or that burden of ego or of self like that.  Conversely, if we remain aloof from things, that only enhances egoism.  So, you see, in this whole principle of Leo/Aquarius as it is with an opposite, there are not only fulfillments, but there are flip-flops of all kinds of ideas……… which I’m too tired to talk about. There are things of which we must be aware and there are different kinds of definitions that come up as we try to live these things on the path.

            So we see that the peep-hole to altruism that another individual is actually becomes a gateway to the whole other side of reality.  So that our whole conception of self is not lost but it is given over to something greater.

            This is a principle profound beyond my capacity to describe it, but it can be applied to our lives in simple ways.  The beautiful thing about it is that with thorough giving, about giving the totality of ourselves, it’s something that cannot be abused, whereas, pseudo altruism or intellectualized altruism or any of those things lead to all kinds of perversions.  We have to give only of ourselves and when we do there is no claim.   There’s an analogy in physical things.  People in sports are told you’re less likely to injure yourself if you give yourself wholeheartedly to an effort than if you have a little hitch to what you’re doing.  Giving ourselves or giving of ourselves is both intense and Leo-like on one hand and altruistic on the other hand.  It goes right to the core of our being and in that it gets right to the character of all humanity.  There are no longer those differences in our character and the character of other people that are brought about by religions or nationalities or any other kind of separations.

            Finally, one last little thought about altruism on the Aquarius/Leo pole, and that is, Leo rules the heart.  Saint Exupery, in his beautiful little story, “The Little Prince” says “It is only with the heart that one can see true; what is essential is invisible to the eye.”

The Little Prince by Saint Exupery

The Little Prince

             But the Aquarian “invisible” that is seen by the heart is not seen; it is felt.  When one gives oneself deeply, in our common language we say, “It is a heartfelt giving.”  There is a lot of wisdom in this common language.  It’s one of those statements that is much more literal than people realize.

            The life spirit has two major seats in the physical body.  One is the pituitary body and the other is the blood together with the heart.  The circulatory system itself is ruled by Aquarius, but the blood and the heart are ruled by Leo and the life spirit.  The three-fold entity, the Self, is composed of the divine spirit, the life spirit and the human spirit.  In brief, its functions can be called willing, healing, and thinking.  The feeling quality is the quality of the life spirit, but it’s Feeling with a capital ‘F’ and it is Loving with a capital ‘L’.  Mystics claim that every time that we do something from the goodness of our heart or when we do something for the Christ’s sake, we literally feel it in our hearts.  There have been one or two times in my life when I have been fortunate enough to feel that.  You literally feel something in your heart.  This has something to do with an anomalous physiology with the heart.  The heart is composed of both voluntary and involuntary muscles.  The claim that is made by mystics is that it becomes voluntary the more that we do altruistic, heartfelt activities.  We develop more of the voluntary muscle.  As we gain control of the heart, we also gain control of the blood and the life spirit which works through both of them.  We can then direct the blood, (….for example) in the brain that has more to do with ethical behavior, with helping other people, and a different way of thinking.  Right now, for survival, most of the blood goes to the centers of the brain that have to do with eating and sex.  This is necessary for self preservation.   

            All muscles of the body are an expression of the desire body.  We move and tell ourselves to get what we desire.  Some clairvoyants claim that if a person is sufficiently sensitive, if you tense a muscle and keep it tense, and you’re in a very silent place, and you hold it to your ear, you can hear the music of the spheres as filtered through the desire body and the muscles.  Those same clairvoyants claim that in a similar way, if you’re completely silent and listen, the blood that rushes through the ears carries the echo of the primordial word, which is a small representation of the macrocosmic creative word.   The smaller version is to hear the Shepherd’s voice.  It’s probably best to hear it in intuition but it can be heard in our ears, but not in the same way that we hear in intuition.            

            The idea is that whether the blood becomes etherized at the same time that our soul bodies become richer and richer from altruistic actions we literally can hear more of the Shepherd’s voice and what we do is we do things for the Christ’s sake or we do things for friendship.  Everyone becomes our friend and we advance the spiritual development for everyone.  This helps us to have a new understanding of the words of Christ when he said near the end of his life, “Ye are my friends.” 

[Editor’s Note: All portrait thumbnail illustrations are editorial content, not part of the lecture]

Aquarian Age Lecture 6a

Microcosm Lecture Series Notes

 

Transitioning Into The Aquarian Age

 

Lecture 6a of 25 by [R]

 

Some Thoughts On Altruism

 

[Editor’s Note: All portrait thumbnail illustrations are editorial content, not part of the lecture]

 

            This is an old talk, it is actually 25 years old, but it’s gone through many changes.  The first time I gave the talk was when I was in Louisville, and it was the one and only time I was in Louisville.

            We’re going to explore Aquarius primarily through the opposite sign, Leo.  The talk is not really unified.  There is not a common theme except altruism which runs through it.  It’s a collection of various thoughts I’ve had about altruism, put together all in one lump.  It’s also not a very profound talk.  It’s important because it’s about living, but there aren’t any super concepts in it. 

            Some of you who know me, by now know that, irrespective of my behavior, I am a moralist.  I’m sort of a cosmic moralist, and if you look at my face in terms of physiognomy, I have these jowls that usually are the sign of a moralist.  They’re called “Germanic jowls” which the Germans have passed on to the English, so you have these jowly moralists in England.  No doubt a lot of the moralism is a reaction to my inability to live according to a high moral standard.  It’s easier to project morals on other people than it is to live them yourself, but that’s what I have to live with.  In being a moralist, I do get kind of growly about it but I’m not quite at the point where I qualify as a Rosicrucian curmudgeon, but I’m getting there; give me a few years and I’ll be the classic curmudgeon.

            The greater part of the moralistic belief in me is due really to conviction.  I’m one who believes that moral and ethical development is foundational.  They are central to any progress in spiritual development.  You cannot grow safely, and you cannot grow well spiritually unless you first are developing yourself morally and ethically.  If we have moral character it is very easy for us to develop the higher spiritual faculties. 

            Most people cannot be trusted with higher spiritual faculties.  If you think about it, one moment of anger could kill several people, because the same energy that is used for healing could be used for killing.  And that’s what we’re talking about.  I believe that the great spiritual leaders of humanity would love to initiate us and teach us about the spiritual powers that we have and how to use them, but it is because of our lack of moral development that we are not there.  This is a general thing for all of humanity.  And it doesn’t even deal with spiritual powers, because we have atomic bombs that we don’t have the moral……to hold back from using.

            Einstein, who was behind the atomic bomb, became a pacifist in his later life, and he even spoke about working with invisible helpers or beings from the other side.  He said, after many, many years of pondering the unified field theory, that there can be no advances in physics until there are advances in psychology.  I think what he meant was that we have to change psychologically before we can see the world.  We do not have enough unity in the entirety of our character to be able to apperceive the unity that would be behind the universal field theory.   Something like that is parallel to our moral development.  Unless we have that moral development, we cannot unfold the higher spiritual faculties.

            In the 14th Century there was a German mystic named Meister Eckhart.   There is a quote that I am very fond of and that I use whenever I can.  He says that one does not see God with the same eye with which one sees a cow.  We have to change and we have to change our consciousness quite radically if we want to see and understand the spiritual worlds.  Anyone who has had even a small waking glimpse of the spiritual worlds and sees how much there is there and how chaotic it all is realizes that it really is something that is disorienting and something that is chaotic.  It takes a long time for a person to become useful as a clairvoyant, because for a long time one is very distorted in his consciousness.

            So, this sounds like a lawless talk.  Eventually we’ll get to saying some things.  Lack of ethical and moral character is the primary impediment to spiritual development.  I can’t say it any clearer, any more straightforward than that.  Without it, we are likely to egregious errors, destructive errors, because we must remember we’re always looking through our own psychology. 

            When you have inner vision and your inner psychology is not clear and you do not know yourself well you see in other people what is really in yourself.  The phenomenon that psychologists call projection is more than just a psychological activity; it is actually part of the perceptive activity.  People talk about seeing things in other people’s auras that are really within their own.

            In this whole matter, Christian mysticism agrees with orthodox Chrisitanity in the basic statement that humanity is in a fallen state.  It doesn’t take much of a glance of looking into the world to see that purely human contributions to the environment around us are terribly ugly and they’re terribly destructive and it’s clear that we violate a lot of delicate balances of nature.  These are all indicative of our fallen state.  We’ve fallen out of harmony with the laws and principles that govern our cosmos.  It isn’t a matter of how intelligent we are.  It isn’t a matter of how well educated we are.  It’s a matter that we don’t have the morality and ethics to respect other things in the cosmos.

            Every advanced being that has come to help us has said exactly the same thing.  If we look at the lives of Christ or the life of Buddha they could have taught us science; they could have taught us food production; they had that kind of consciousness, but what they all focused on was loving one another and being more compassionate toward one another and caring about each other.  If great conscious beings like that look at our life in this way, it seems to be a pretty good indication that it is imperative to us to have that kind of consciousness.  We have to take it to heart and we have to strive for moral perfection.  In order to achieve things in that, it’s supplanting egoism with altruism.  Our thoughts and our desire are very self-centered, and they are selfishly self-centered.  In order for us to have a grand macrocosmic understanding of the world around us we have to have a moral consciousness that is altruistic, so as we approach the Aquarian Age, if we want to be able to be the most that we can for the benefit of people and for the whole ongoing evolution and to do the least destruction, it is important that we work toward altruism.  (This is the end of the introduction)

            A lot of what is going to be said in what follows is far-fetched and some of it even seems fantastic.  It isn’t important that you believe in it.  What is important is that you can treat it as a story, as long as you get the moral of the story.  All right, let’s go into the first thought on altruism.

            When I was born the Sun was in the tropical sign, Scorpio and Scorpio represents the creative force that is involved with generation, but because of our fallen state it often has to do with regeneration—regeneration in the midst of destruction and elimination and those are all keywords for Scorpio.  Now, in the mid-1960’s I lived in Southern California, and when I had free time I used to hang out with the folkies, sometimes in Mission Beach and sometimes in Ocean Beach.  I had a dear friend who was a folk comedian from a little town outside of Farmington called Saint Paul, Minnesota.  Those are actually lines from one of his songs.  He was a Scorpio also, and he practiced elimination and creation in a different way.  He used to write most of his songs while he was sitting on the toilet.  At the same time he was eliminating something, he was open to bringing something new in, something creative.

            Myself, I have been a little bit more extremist and a little bit more radical.  During most of my life I have been a rebel to the core of my being.  I rebelled against every authority and I rebelled against everything until I was an atheist.  And I remained an atheist until I had experiences that proved that I couldn’t be an atheist any more.  Now the bad part of this is I didn’t get a very good education because I was always fighting against getting educated.  But, the good part of it was that I didn’t take everything of my education hook, line, and sinker.  All of the people that took it all in and accepted it all and fed it all back as good students basically fell asleep.  If it wasn’t for my rebellion, I probably would have fallen asleep also, but rebelling and rebelling until I came into things that I couldn’t rebel against is where I was able to finally get into the kind of life that I find myself in now.   So, when we approach new things, as we are trying to approach altruism, we have to be careful that we don’t look at them in terms of the old, because the old is authority.  The old is ruled by Capricorn and Saturn, and that is the planet that likes authority.  We have to look at new things all as themselves alone, and not with regard to the old. 

            I had an experience with that on one of the very first times I went across the border into Mexico.  I tasted a mango, and not knowing what a mango was, I didn’t know how to describe it to people.  I made the fatal mistake of trying to describe the mango in terms of things that I already knew.  It was clever enough, but it really wasn’t fair to the mango.  I said that a mango was a peach that had gone to heaven.  But, really a mango is a mango and it should be seen for itself.  So, we must not rely on the past, but look at things new.

            In looking at altruism, we have to be careful and not relate it to other things in the same way that I related a mango to peaches.

            The first thought on altruism, is that altruism is not universal brotherhood, and universal brotherhood is not altruism.  In the astrological mandala which is the horoscope for all of society, brotherhood and altruism are ruled by two different signs and houses.  microcosm-mandala-a4Brotherhood is ruled by Gemini and the third house.  Altruism is ruled by Aquarius and the eleventh house.  Though there are parallels between the two of them and similarities between the two, they are two very different things.  Both are lofty ideals and both of them help people to live harmoniously with each other.  But the function of how they operate and why they operate as they operate is very different.   Each of them uses a different idea.

            We don’t have time to be exhaustive about comparing Gemini to Aquarius, but we can look at a few little things.  Gemini is utilitarian.  Gemini does practical things.  Usually it is a reciprocal utilitarianism.  The function of brotherhoods is to help each other.  The principle is usually mercantile in most brotherhoods.  It is based on a principle that we have in folk knowledge where we say, “You scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours.”  There is always a personal benefit and there’s a mutual interdependence when you have brotherhood, and that is an internal necessity.

            The best internal necessity of reciprocity ruled by Gemini is the lungs.  We have to breathe out in order to breathe in and that reciprocity of in-breathing and out-breathing is absolutely necessary in keeping us alive.   Now, in the human microcosm and in the divine macrocosm it is also a necessary principle.  But, it is more a principle that applies to this world than applies to the other world.  When we’re speaking about the other world, Christ says, “My kingdom is not of this world.”  Neither is the kingdom of altruism which is associated with Aquarius.

            The whole feeling of Aquarius is other-worldly.  In horoscopes where there is a lot of Aquarian influence, there is often a desire to go flying off into the spiritual worlds and not come back, if possible, and there’s always some kind of a drive to altruism.  There is a quest for freedom.  Each of the succedent houses has to do with a different kind of freedom.   The second house has to do with financial freedom.  If you have money you can travel or buy things you want, and you’re free in a financial way.

            The fifth house represents freedom of expression.  A person who can’t pour out his thoughts or his feelings is a person who is in prison in his own being.  And so in the fifth house we have the whole quality of freedom of expression.

            The eighth house is a Scorpionic kind of freedom.  It is a freedom from things.  You get rid of things.  You get rid of them, especially if you’re a Mafioso kind of eighth house person.  You can be free of that person who is your enemy, because you have eliminated him.  So, when you talk to a Scorpio person who doesn’t have the whole horoscope in their being, they say, I want to be rid of that or I want to be free from that.  I want to be my own person away from all that.

            The last succedent house is the eleventh house which is associated with Aquarius, and that is pure freedom.  It doesn’t make any difference whether you own things or don’t own things.  A person who has true freedom is like Aquarius which is an airy sign; it is suspended within the possessions that it has.  It doesn’t have to be me that is expressing; it is someone who is free to express, and not only to express in a personal way, but to express in a universal way.    One doesn’t have to eliminate something.  If you have infinite love with altruism you don’t have to eliminate something to be free from it.  You’re free in yourself.  Yes, you can go flying off into those inner worlds, but you’re basically free inside of yourself.

            Friendship, which is another name for altruism, is offended by pragmatism.  We help our friends, and we call on our friends for help, but the relationship is not based on pragmatism.  If it’s based on pragmatism, it isn’t friendship.  Altruistic love is given freely.  If it isn’t given freely it isn’t altruistic love.  In this regard, altruism is almost impossibly other-worldly.

            The eleventh house is the house of utopianism.  Utopianism is a word that was coined by Plato that means “nowhere,” and Plato was one of those Aquarians that was other-worldly.    By utopianism we mean something that is done for its own sake.  Art for art’s sake or doing good for the sake of doing good.  All of the do-good organizations like the temperance union and all of those are Aquarian organizations.  I had a very good friend named Daisy Lamberti and she belonged to so many of those organizations it was unbelievable.  So, we can see that there is something in the principle of Aquarius and altruism that lifts us up above pragmatism.  This is not to say that pragmatism is bad.  This world is important and functioning well in this world is necessary before we can move into the inner worlds.  But the simple fact is that there’s something about Aquarius and altruism that is other-worldly.

            Now one of the key points in this is that with Aquarius and altruism we have the opportunity of being self-forgetting.  That’s what we learn in friendship.  We forget about ourselves for the sake of our friends.  As we said, this is actually the Leo talk, and let’s talk about something that is very Leonine that both Plato and Gurdjieff loved to talk about that was from the opposite sign, Leo and that is: self-remembering.   Plato is very much misunderstood, especially among the academics.  They miss all of the mysticism in Plato and even some of the Platonists miss some of the mysticism in Plato.  There are loads of things in Plato to be harvested in terms of mysticism.

            Plato had the doctrine that all education was remembering, and since he does talk about past rebirths in other times, the scholars believe that he’s saying that all education is remembering something that you learned in a past life.  It’s an outlook that has to be fallacious, because if you only know the things from your past life then you wouldn’t learn anything new in this life.  The idea that education is remembering is misunderstood.  Plato’s theory of education is given in a dialogue called the Meno and in the Meno Socrates takes a young boy, probably a youth, a teenager, and he carries him through a proof of a geometric theorem that the boy never knew.  And the boy gets the theorem right.  He hadn’t studied the geometry, but what happens is, at every step of the proof of the theorem, Plato asks the young man, “What do you feel about this or does this seem true to you?”

            He is asking the young man to remember himself; remember himself, in the sense of the intuitive understanding or the intuitive apperception of truth.  That is the way it works.  If you look at the example very clearly, I don’t know how the scholars can take it the way that they do.  We’re talking about the paradox here of Leo and Aquarius.  We’re talking about being self-forgetting.  Some people would love to be self-forgetting.  They would like to forget all of the lower-self consciousness where they have all of their neuroses and things like that, but we’re talking about a different kind of self forgetting.  We’re talking about even self forgetting of the higher transcendental self.  We’re forgetting our divine Self to something that is beyond Self.  That’s something that we’re going to come back to in a little bit.  We’re going to have to come back to where we are now.  This lecture is choppy, doesn’t flow smoothly.

            Now, let’s come to the strange other-worldly way of Aquarius.  Scripture tells us that the ways of God are strange to the ways of men.  We’ve seen a little bit of that when comparing altruism to brotherhood.  It’s a kind of other-worldliness that is so strange that it can’t really relate to this world.  It’s refreshingly and radically different than the attitudes of this world.  In this world we have another statement that it’s a dog-eat-dog world, and dogs don’t even eat each other, but that’s the kind of worldly attitude we have, and we’re talking about trying to get to altruism, because we all want to be altruistic.  We want to be loving, because if we are completely loving, we are completely working in harmony with things.    We have the intuition that comes along with altruism to be completely in harmony with things.

            The point we’re trying to make at this juncture is that we cannot practice altruism with knowledge.  We cannot practice altruism in the same way we practice a piano, and I doubt that there could even be a school for altruism.   We just can’t make ourselves love that way.  What we use to try to practice is the thing that needs to be changed, and the lesser cannot change the greater is what I’m trying to say here, I guess.  It seems that if we want to be altruistic we have to practice something that is necessary for altruism but that isn’t necessarily altruism itself.  We have to make our character amenable to altruism.  We have to practice developing our character so that it is a character through which altruism can and wants to be expressed.

            We’re talking about our character, ……..personality as it runs parallel to the Aquarian ideal of altruism.  Transcendental parallelism is not always a one-for-one thing and it’s not always easy to understand.  When we’re trying to understand altruism, we have to go all the way back to Meister Eckhart and say that we can’t see God with the same eye that we see a cow.  It’s the same idea that comes back to us again and again.  To apperceive or to experience altruism we have to forget a lot more than self and we have to remember something else, just as the boy, Meno, represented something else.

            Now, probably everybody in this room has had some small experience of altruism and everybody in this room has a sense of what altruism is like.  Those who have had a fully conscious waking experience of the source of altruism, no matter what their religion, no matter what their culture; they all claim that it is from the realms of pure spirit.  This means that it is beyond anything phenomenal.  Physical things, vital and energetic things, emotional and feeling things, thoughts, ideas, and even the idea of Self; none of those reach the realms of altruism.  Pure spirit just is.  It is and it is sufficient unto itself.  It subsists within its own being beyond definitive conception.  It can’t be conceptualized.  It is even beyond the idea or the concept that is God.  Spirit is, but God is an idea.  It is a living idea and it is an important idea as a focus for spirit but is not the same thing as spirit.

            God is an idea in the region of ideational or abstract thought.  We can point in the direction of the realms of pure spirit, but we can’t speak of it directly because it’s ineffable.  Anyone who has ever experienced the realms of pure spirit says the same thing.  They are only pointing, because what the experience is, cannot be said in words.

            Proceeding from these limited concrete realms upward into the realms of spirit, the first realm of pure spirit is called “life spirit.”  In street language it’s called Christ consciousness.  In the Orient it is called the “Buddhic plane,” and the Northern Buddhists call it “the void,” because it’s void of any kind of condition or of any kind of relationship or any kind of conceptualization, which is what we just said.  We’re very strict about that.   The Zen Buddhists call it the “not self” using the negative to point to something that is positive that is beyond words or that is beyond concrete manifestation.

            Now, each of these views about life spirit is important to understanding altruism.  We don’t have time to go into all of them, so we will just follow what seems to be right for a short talk like this which may end up being two hours.   I’m laughing because I can laugh.  You have to sit in the chairs for two hours!

            Some Christian mystics call the life spirit the “beyond self.”  It doesn’t matter what we call it provided we can experience it and provided we can live it into existence.  However, this name, “beyond self” points where we want to go with understanding the realm and living altruism, and that is self-watching.  There are different kinds of self-watching.  It’s a difficult thing, because there are different ways it can be accomplished and you can come at it from totally different perspectives.  You can come at it from the perspective of personality, or you can come at it from the perspective of beyond self.  It’s so difficult that Max Heindel, the founder of The Rosicrucian Fellowship, used to talk about and love to quote the Scotch poet, Bobby Burns.  “Oh that God the gift would give us, to see ourselves as others see us.”  That’s one kind of self-watching.  That is an impersonal, external self-watching.  Other people can discern our behavior, because they don’t have anything at stake in it, and they can see what we are which we lie to ourselves and say we aren’t.  Or we are unaware of seeing it in ourselves where we take ourselves for granted. 

Robert Burns

Robert Burns

             Normally, we come to self consciousness through a process of transcendence.  The process of coming to self consciousness through transcendence is through concentrated thinking.  When the general will of the three-fold spirit that is focused through the self is fully activated in the process of thinking it becomes enlivened.  In the process of thinking it becomes aware of itself as the thinker.  Arriving at self-consciousness, which on the street is known as the baptism of the Holy Spirit, in that way is a matter of concentrating very, very deeply and thinking very deeply and becoming aware of oneself as “the thinker” and then transferring the attention from the thought to the thinker.  That is what is called “meditation.”  It is knowing oneself in a transcendental way.  But it is possible to transcend that.  Instead of coming to know yourself by watching your thinking and then watching you watch your thinking, you can transcend self and you can contemplate Self.  These words are pretty universal through all kinds of religions.

            So, we want to get at contemplation of Self, which means transcending self to that which is beyond self.  It should be mentioned at this point that transcending self into contemplation does not mean destroying or dissolving the Self, which would be a dangerous and blasphemous notion.  After these many millions and millions of years that we have developed the Self, the thought that we should destroy it as soon as we know we have it is utterly blasphemous; it’s like saying that the divine beings that brought us to this in creation were fooling us all along and giving us something to throw away.  So, we want to get to transcending self without destroying it.

            When one transcends self, one transcends to a state of pure spirit which in Christian mysticism is called “life spirit.”  Now this is the realm of pure truth.  The realm of ideas where the self is found is where truths are – where all of the different concepts or laws of nature are, but when we transcend that to pure truth we have the pure light of truth that is unconditioned.  It is the source of the Self which is an idea, so in this regard the realm of life spirit is a realm of selfness.  It is the stuff out of which Self is made.  Now, being so singular and being so unconditioned and unconditional it is unified.  That unity of it all that holds it together as one is Love.  It is Love with a capital “L.”  Hence, this is the realm of altruism.

            When we transcend self to the level of contemplation wherein we can contemplate Self, which is probably the best way to do it, because it is sort of an anchor to us, when we transcend to this level of being, we are in the realm of altruism out of which all selves are created.  There is no possible way that you cannot love everything that is in existence.  You just love.  That’s what the nature of it is.  Each of us, if we penetrate deeply enough into our own nature and beyond the conception that we have of ourselves, which is a divine conception (if we get beyond that), we have this Love.  It is Love for everything, and that is the source of altruism.

            Altruism is an experience.   It isn’t a practice.  This is a pretty abstract presentation, so I’ll try to give you a picture.  You have to be careful when you make these kinds of pictures.  They’re very dangerous, because sometimes people think that the metaphor, or the poetic image, or the picture is the reality.  In this case it comes very close to being the reality.  In the Old Testament in the exodus, Jehovah, who is the Holy Spirit, who is sort of the cosmic Self, the central Self, or everything in manifestation, when the people are passing out of Atlantis and into the promised land, Jehovah is pictured at night as a whirlpool pillar of fire and in the daytime as a whirlpool pillar of smoke.

            If we look at another place, Elijah, when he saw God, was carried up in a whirlwind which is a vertical spiral.  The ancient sophists thought at one time that the form of God was the spiral, which caused Aristophenes to make fun of it in a play he attributed to Socrates (which is an incorrect attribution) that God is a spiral.  In a way it’s true and in a way it isn’t true.  The form that spirit takes in manifestation usually is a spiral of some kind.  Whether it is the spiral of a spiral galaxy or the spiral of the DNA molecule, they are all expressions of manifestations within a very fluidic spirit.

            This stuff is not very fluidic and as a consequence we have great misunderstandings of the nature of what things really are.  Now, let’s look at the image.  If we think of an ocean that has no top or bottom, it’s just ocean, and within that ocean there is an eddy, a whirlpool, an empty something or other.  That empty something or other, that vacuum within the almost solid but fluidic continuity of spirit is, Self.  

            Our conception of Self, our outlook, is like looking at the whirlpool.  The process of understanding life spirit and having the contemplative experience and the experience of altruism is a transfer of consciousness from the emptiness of the eddy to the fullness of the ocean.  It’s a very, very beautiful image.

            Different people have different names for it.  In the Orient, for example, where the Hindus call the knowledge of Self the whirlpool (they don’t use “the whirlpool” at least not to my knowledge) they call that “…….”  It is associated with Neptune, the kind of intuition that is knowing, and the other kind of experience, the experience in the life spirit is called “…….” from the same root as “nirvana.”

            Now, how does this apply to our lives?   The biblical Christ tells us to love our neighbor as our self and that’s a very different thing than doing unto others as you would have others do unto you.  Your neighbor is yourself.  That is a representation of the transference of consciousness from thinking about or loving yourself; instead loving your neighbor.  When you see the world through the eyes of the love of your neighbor; it’s like transferring from the whirlpool to the ocean.  One drop of the ocean is like the whole ocean, so once you experience one drop or one experience of the ocean of altruism you know the whole business.

            The beautiful thing about it is, if we can do this we’re completely free of egoism.  And we don’t absolve our self of any responsibilities.  We still have the eddy, we still have the responsibility, the whirlpool, and we still have things to carry out, but now we can carry them out with a full understanding of purpose.  If there is anything about the realm of life spirit, about the altruism of that realm, it’s that it is purposeful.  The people that we admire and the people that we stand in awe of are people who have purpose.  It is because they have an inkling or they have the beginning of that kind of experience of that kind of purpose. 

            We’re talking about an indivisible unity, and any division is only an apparent division just as the eddy is an apparency.  One way of looking at this is a little different than what the famous writer Gertrude Stein said.  Gertrude Stein said,” I am because my cat loves me.”  This is like saying” I am because you are love.”

Gertrude Stein

Gertrude Stein

  It’s a realization that the love of the other is the only way that the definition of Self can be found.   We have it in another sense.  Again, in the Platonistic sense said much better by the biblical Christ, “This do in remembrance of me.”  It is remembering that intuition of truth, and it is remembering that we can Love and we can often Love just by taking memory of the capability of loving.  It’s completely spontaneous.  There is no practice.  One Loves and the Love is unconditioned and it is unconditional.  There isn’t the strain that there is when there is self, or even worse, personal ego.  All kinds of strain is why Christ, speaking of this state says, “My yoke is easy, and my burden is light.”   So, we can see that if we can penetrate to the experience of altruistic Love, we can be altruistic.  But, we can’t practice altruism.

            Obviously, some of these things are exceedingly difficult to understand with our mundane consciousness.  We’re only at the beginning of waking up objective self consciousness.  Things of the spirit exist in themselves.  The Old Testament says, I am that I am.  It sounds awfully arbitrary, but it’s really a statement of reality.  Transcendent spiritual experience may seem overwhelming, but it’s whole, and that kind of consciousness is very different than our consciousness here which is always in part.  Even our most abstract consciousness and the most abstract symbolical logic is in part.  It’s not in whole.  It’s so much that the spiritual philosophies of ancient times who were thinking of wholes thought that the spirit did not grow.   This is very different from modern Western spiritual philosophy.  All spiritual philosophies talk about awakening to spirit.  And all of them speak about unfolding potentials within spirit.  But modern spiritual philosophies find that there is soul growth and through soul growth there is spiritual growth.  When we’re talking about growth in this regard, we’re talking not about extensive growth the way a tree grows.  We’re talking about intensive growth of something that grows more within itself and through itself, and if you want to say it in that paradoxical way, it becomes more of itself.

            There are no limits to internal intensive growth.  All of the attributes of the spirit always remain whole in the entire process of it.  This has turned out to be a much more difficult talk than I thought it would.  We’re not even halfway yet, so….we have to relate to mundane analogies,   We have to reverse the natural law of analogy which goes as above, so below.  We’ll have to go from so below to as above.  If we create something, we create on the basis of intuition and intuition is a divine creative experience.  In that divine creative experience, the realization of creativity comes from what is called Uranian intuition.  Uranus rules Aquarius and points to life spirit.

            Robert Frost says, with regard to creation, (another one of my very favorite statements, because it applies to so many things) “If there are no surprises for the poet, there will be no surprises for the reader.”

Robert Frost

Robert Frost

             What we are participating in is a creation.  A creation is the manifestation of a creative dream, or a creative scheme that some people call an evolutionary scheme.  It’s not just an evolution; it’s a creation.  There is new experience, completely new experience – a new experience within the infinite potential of the absolute.  It’s not rote, it’s not repetitive, and it’s not the same old—same old for the creative spirit.  It has to be new and creative for the creator for it to be new and creative for those who are experiencing it.  Looking at it another way, even though the world of spirit is very different than the material world, and the laws of logic and the ways of understanding are very different,  it’s completely impossible that there could be new experiences and new creations without there being the same for the creator.               

          There is a danger in this that happens to a lot of artists.  They make more of their creations than they merit and as a result they close off the creative fountain.  Now, this is a very enormous topic, and we’re only going to speak about a minute fraction of it as it applies to altruism only.  We are trying to understand how the creative dream or the scheme of evolution is made real and why it isn’t just a dream – and to understand our part in it, because we are a very important part in it.  It is through us in microcosm, that the matter, which is the seeming unreality, which is the dream and the stuff of the dream, has to be spiritualized.  It has to be made real in the spirit, because reality is in the spirit.  There is what is called, or could be called, the law of service.  Each of us is a miniature, a microcosm, of the grand creation and each of us, in our own way, fills out the entire creation.  But, because the greater macrocosmic dream was shared with us, it gets the feedback from all of these milliards and milliards of dreams from the different participants

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »